US Navy release patents for anti grav technology

Apr 2017
524
128
This is something many observers have been expecting for a long time. The release of high tech to the surface population , tech which had previously been hoarded and kept off world... Trumps 'Space Force' is part of the same process ...

"18 Apr 2019 ...The US Navy has been granted a patent for an advanced aircraft which resembles a flying saucer UFO. Military inventors filed plans for a highly unusual flying machine which uses an ‘inertial mass reduction device’ to travel at ‘extreme speeds’. What that means is that the aircraft uses complex technology to reduce its mass and thereby lessen inertia (an object’s resistance to motion) so it can zoom along at high velocities. The patent is highly complex and describes methods of reducing the mass of an aircraft . These drawings were filed as part of the patent and show a craft which looks a lot like a UFO (Photo: Salvatore Cezar Pais/ Google) ‘It is possible to reduce the inertial mass and hence the gravitational mass, of a system/object in motion, by an abrupt perturbation of the non-linear background of local spacetime,’ the patent says. The craft described in the patent features a cavity wall filled with gas, which is then made to vibrate using powerful electromagnetic waves. This then creates a vacuum around the craft, allowing it to propel itself at high speeds. The UFO-style ship can be used in water, air or even space. ‘It is possible to envision a hybrid aerospace/undersea craft (HAUC), which due to the physical mechanisms enabled with the inertial mass reduction device, can function as a submersible craft capable of extreme underwater speeds… and enhanced stealth capabilities,’ the patent continues. ‘This hybrid craft would move with great ease through the air/space/water mediums, by being enclosed in a vacuum plasma bubble/sheath.’ Although the US Navy applied for the patent in 2016 and it was granted last year, it doesn’t necessarily mean the craft has been built and tested. However, the technology is further evidence of the military’s interest in developing ‘exotic’ technologies. U.S. DoD video of F/A-18 Super Hornet and an unknown object. Play Video Loaded: 0% 0:00Progress: 0% PlayMute Current Time 0:00 / Duration Time 0:33 Fullscreen MORE: Pentagon and MoD officials feared UFOs were either ‘demonic’ or sent by God, former investigators reveal Earlier this year, it was revealed that US government researchers investigated wormholes, antigravity, invisibility cloaking, warp drives and high energy laser weapons during a probe into ‘unexplained aerial phenomena’ called the Advanced Aerospace Threat and Identification Program (AATIP). Details of AATIP were first released in 2017, including reports of a sighting made by fighter pilots from the USS Nimitz. These pilots saw a huge patch of churning, turbulent water the size of a Boeing 737, suggesting something was beneath the surface, as well as a ‘tic tac’ aircraft which zoomed off at almost impossibly high speeds. We spoke to Nick Pope, former UFO investigator at the Ministry of Defence, and asked if he saw any similarities between the patented design and the Nimitz Tic Tac. ‘A hybrid craft, capable of flying both in the air and underwater, is uncannily similar to what was reported in the USS Nimitz incident from 2004,’ he said. ‘There was a similar incident of a UFO flying underwater in Puerto Rico in 2013. The possible connection between the USS Nimitz incident and this patent is intriguing, and it’s interesting that the US Navy seems to be the link here. ‘It’s possible that the patent is inspired by the incident and is part of an attempt to work out the technology behind the objects that were chased by the Navy F-18s. This is known as ‘reverse-engineering’.’...."

[youtube]zap984YekG8[/youtube]
 
Mar 2019
774
40
cosmos
Oz:
It seems to beyond technology and engineering.
Somewhat alike science fiction, that kind of Holleywood...
(But I can't exclude the existance of a symmetric cosmos. If matters in that cosmos interact with us, any physical rule will reverse. But nobody knows where's it. It will be the ultimate topic even beyond anti matter, dark matter, etc. Not a device made up matter in this cosmos is able to do that, I guess. A s - dragon will be there, perhaps...)
 
Last edited:

ChipB

PHF Helper
Jun 2010
2,361
289
Morristown, NJ USA
I sincerely doubt that the patent says anything about "anti gravity," but to be sure, please provide the patent number so we can review it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people

topsquark

Forum Staff
Apr 2008
2,972
629
On the dance floor, baby!
I have heard that a saucer shaped aircraft is actually very unstable in flight. However that didn't stop the Navy from building one. A few years ago the Navy flew it to a military airshow, with predictable results. :)

-Dan
 
Apr 2017
524
128
I sincerely doubt that the patent says anything about "anti gravity," but to be sure, please provide the patent number so we can review it.


Some disagreement on the wed about this , some believe the whole thing maybe diss-info ...or that the Navy have now covered their tracks.

[youtube]m2l6rNeJXMU[/youtube]
 
Last edited:

ChipB

PHF Helper
Jun 2010
2,361
289
Morristown, NJ USA
I reviewed the patent (US 10144532B2), and it describes a craft that would use high energy microwaves to reduce the inertial mass of its structure, apparently by altering the normal occurrence of "quantum fluctuations" in the region adjacent to the craft, presumably creating a quantum vacuum that can pull the craft forward, while also reducing the craft's inertial mass. Not sure this quantum disruption conjecture has ever been demonstrated even on a small scale in a lab, so whether it could be applied to a large craft seems highly speculative. My guess is that if the phenomenon could be demonstrated it would require an enormous amount of energy.

In my experience patent applications like this are typically rejected as purely speculative unless the inventor can demonstrate the feasibility of the technology, and in this patent there is no discussion of models or lab experiments, just references to other papers by the inventor (including one that claims this type of technology can lead to faster-than-light travel). So I'm a bit surprised that the patent was granted. One other note - given that the Naval Air Warfare Center decided to pursue a patent, meaning the information is made freely available to all including potential military adversaries, I think this signals that they see no real practical application of the technology.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Mar 2019
774
40
cosmos
physics vs film

ChipB seems to be an honest analyst.
Modern physics seems to be a headless fly.
Where's benit13? He seems to be the film director...
Cosmos Navy...
Holleywood...
 

topsquark

Forum Staff
Apr 2008
2,972
629
On the dance floor, baby!
I have heard that a saucer shaped aircraft is actually very unstable in flight. However that didn't stop the Navy from building one. A few years ago the Navy flew it to a military airshow, with predictable results. :)

-Dan
Just in case anyone starts thinking about this, the saucer the Navy built used the usual jet thing, not antigravity or some other unknown propulsion.

-Dan
 
Mar 2019
774
40
cosmos
@dragon:
I read some materials about "quantum fluctuation" in web before, but I feel them messy and cryptic.
Can you make a decent introduction here?
Thanks.
 

topsquark

Forum Staff
Apr 2008
2,972
629
On the dance floor, baby!
@dragon:
I read some materials about "quantum fluctuation" in web before, but I feel them messy and cryptic.
Can you make a decent introduction here?
Thanks.
Ummmmm..... To do this properly would require the introductory chapter of a book on Quantum Statistical Mechanics and this is not a part of QM that I know all that well. I'm going to have to say "no" to this one. Sorry!

-Dan