To use the d.E Hamiltonian, need state be transformed?

Feb 2017
1
0
To use the electric dipole (d.E) Hamiltonian, need state be transformed?

I am reading Cohen-Tannoudji's Atom photon interactions (2004 version), in the Appendix he explains that for atom-light interaction, the electric dipole Hamiltonian (d.E form) is got from the original, "physical" (in line with his language) p.A form Hamiltonian by a time-independent unitary transformation (eq. (72) of the Appendix at page 635).

Basically, $H_{d.E}=TH_{p.A}T^{\dagger}$, where $H_{d.E}$ is the Hamiltonian in electric dipole form, while $H_{p.A}$ is the p.A form Hamiltonian, and $T$ is the unitary transformation.

Then isn't it that if one wants to make calculations using the electric dipole Hamiltonian, one needs to first carry out the transformation on the initial state? That is, the initial state should be $T \left | \phi_{ini} \right \rangle $ but not simply $\left | \phi_{ini} \right \rangle$? where $\left | \phi_{ini} \right \rangle$ is the ("physical") initial state under the p.A representation.

However when he calculates the photondetection signal in Complement $\textrm{A}_{\textrm{II}}$ (more specifically see eq. (22) and texts around it in this Complement), there seems no indication that this transformation is carried out? Am I missing something?
 
Last edited:

topsquark

Forum Staff
Apr 2008
2,978
631
On the dance floor, baby!
I am reading Cohen-Tannoudji's Atom photon interactions (2004 version), in the Appendix he explains that for atom-light interaction, the electric dipole Hamiltonian (d.E form) is got from the original, "physical" (in line with his language) p.A form Hamiltonian by a time-independent unitary transformation (eq. (72) of the Appendix at page 635).

Basically, $H_{d.E}=TH_{p.A}T^{\dagger}$, where $H_{d.E}$ is the Hamiltonian in electric dipole form, while $H_{p.A}$ is the p.A form Hamiltonian, and $T$ is the unitary transformation.

Then isn't it that if one wants to make calculations using the electric dipole Hamiltonian, one needs to first carry out the transformation on the initial state? That is, the initial state should be $T \left | \phi_{ini} \right \rangle $ but not simply $\left | \phi_{ini} \right \rangle$? where $\left | \phi_{ini} \right \rangle$ is the ("physical") initial state under the p.A representation.

However when he calculates the photondetection signal in Complement $\textrm{A}_{\textrm{II}}$ (more specifically see eq. (22) and texts around it in this Complement), there seems no indication that this transformation is carried out? Am I missing something?
Am I right in assuming that you are using the Hamiltonian representation? In this representation the state kets are independent of the transformation and the operators contain the dynamical information for the system.

-Dan