I find it "spooky" that speed relativity and gravity relativity works for SR and GR. QFT is awesome in its own right but completely incapable of defining gravity even with the Higgs as it was initially described as the particle responsible for particles having mass, not as a "carrier" of the gravitational force as was "introduced" more recently along side the wave function which still can't be detected, being searched for in the form of gravitational waves. I have a unique perspective in which I believe "spin foam", in its infancy, has made a reference I have seen God knows where that said gravity was a direct result of spacetime itself, manifest in the spin foam models, and recently something came to "light" contemplating the theoretical realm of SR that may have been taken a bit skewed. What i mean by skewed is the "contraction" of spacetime, typical taken in the current accepted theory, as t and x being contracted. As for the spin foam models, that start with points connected by line segments, which in the 3D version form a tetrahedron:
http://physicshelpforum.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=1243&stc=1&d=1416194095
This apparently can be "imagined" as a 4dimensional object by visualizing a point in the center radiating to the points of the object which can be viewed as t represented as the line pointing behind you, as in the fact that you are always moving away from time in the 3dimensions forward with z pointing up and x and y on the floor in front of you, y is left and x is right, as would naturally rotate to a graph on the wall with x> and y proceeds up on the left with z coming off the wall towards you. When you imagine the effects motion of mass through spacetime as contraction of all 4 dimensions equally it also models the energy and mass transformations in a consistent manner transitioning to general relativity seamlessly. When this concept is applied to structures of mass and energy having equal supplemental contribution the realization of the stunningly simple set of blocks describing not only how physics interact, but WHY they just "happen" to behave the way they do. From atoms to stable molecules in plamsa to gas to liquid to solid everything falls into place!
What I need to figure out is a way to "transform" 4 dimensions in this model into 4 dimensions flat that can stack as 5 sided (bottom empty) AND "lie open" into interlocking sheets cascading along the time aspect in strings or branches. Wow maybe "string theory" has something to it?
http://physicshelpforum.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=1243&stc=1&d=1416194095
This apparently can be "imagined" as a 4dimensional object by visualizing a point in the center radiating to the points of the object which can be viewed as t represented as the line pointing behind you, as in the fact that you are always moving away from time in the 3dimensions forward with z pointing up and x and y on the floor in front of you, y is left and x is right, as would naturally rotate to a graph on the wall with x> and y proceeds up on the left with z coming off the wall towards you. When you imagine the effects motion of mass through spacetime as contraction of all 4 dimensions equally it also models the energy and mass transformations in a consistent manner transitioning to general relativity seamlessly. When this concept is applied to structures of mass and energy having equal supplemental contribution the realization of the stunningly simple set of blocks describing not only how physics interact, but WHY they just "happen" to behave the way they do. From atoms to stable molecules in plamsa to gas to liquid to solid everything falls into place!
What I need to figure out is a way to "transform" 4 dimensions in this model into 4 dimensions flat that can stack as 5 sided (bottom empty) AND "lie open" into interlocking sheets cascading along the time aspect in strings or branches. Wow maybe "string theory" has something to it?
Attachments

329.1 KB Views: 5
Last edited: