More on work and energy

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oct 2017
536
256
Glasgow
Have you really read the document carefully?
It looks that not.

So it is senseless to discuss each nonsense you have written.
That's a pity. Chip's feedback is excellent. It's very clear, precise and much kinder than any advice I would give.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Jun 2010
422
33
NC
Thanks and Hello...

Jim Pohl here... (THERMO Spoken Here!)

Thanks: I write to thank you for your donation of "nothing-to-do-time" to address this
thread by Oleg. Oleg titled his thread in the manner of a challenge to
the PHF moderators. You met the challenge.

I visit PHF now and then to read. I have seen instances where some moderator or other has posted "off-hand" perjorative remarks and such. I think philipsin (is it?) also gets this treatment. Anyway, it is damaging to PHF that bad-mouth dialog appears on the home page screen. You don't do this. So I thank you for addressing Oleg properly.

Hello: I have a number of technical books. My wife has nagged me for 30 years to throw them out. I hung onto them anyway. But now I see they need a new home and promptly. I don't want the books trashed. I am distant from my students.

To start, I have one very interesting tome you might like. It is Ganot's Physics. ~ 900 pages
published in 1889. (mint condition). Could I mail it to you?

Thanks, Jim Pohl
P.S. I guess this note has violated the PHF protocal. Sorry!
 

topsquark

Forum Staff
Apr 2008
2,935
610
On the dance floor, baby!
P.S. I guess this note has violated the PHF protocal. Sorry!
No worries.

Have you really read the document carefully?
It looks that not.
Actually ChipB's read of your article is basically the same as mine. (He caught a few more details and he's a better writer than me, anyway, so I'm glad he did it.)

Here's a thought. In your rebuttal you dismissed much of what he was saying and repeated your claim that the standard definition of work is all wrong. Could you go over his points and let us know what about your article he got wrong? I might be wrong (I didn't double check) but as I recall you didn't clearly write a reason why the standard definition of work is wrong... you simply said it was and how you would fix it.

At the very least ChipB brought up the point that you are using the standard definition of electrical work and matching it up with your definition of mechanical work and these two can't be mixed with your redefinition. Could I ask you to please go over this part in more detail?

-Dan
 
Apr 2018
39
1
I might be wrong (I didn't double check) but as I recall you didn't clearly write a reason why the standard definition of work is wrong
So do check finally!

I am saying exactly about it. Read the document!

You have been spending a lot of time on nothing, stating senseless things.

The whole logic of official physics is totally wrong.
So it is senseless to go over those (ChipB's) points since this whole logic is wrong.

Once again.


Attention
This whole work is strictly based on practical experiments and consistent logical conclusions. Because of that it is very important to read this document from the very beginning, consistently and carefully (step by step, string by string) without any jumping over.



I have provided the experiments logically proving the existence of the 2 biggest basic errors of modern physics and the existence of new Energy.

Just study those experiments and those logical explanations of them totally carefully.

Experiments and logic are my extraordinary proof!

“The Revolution in Science. The New Biggest Ever Fundamental Discoveries in Physics. The experimental discovery of New Clean Renewable (Inexhaustible) Energy.”
https://medium.com/p/d8919d784567


My recommendations on how to read the document:

Start reading. Carefully, string by string.
It is critically important to start from the very beginning of the document.

As soon as you get to a fragment that you do not understand or that you do not agree with, just write me a note and I will give you additional explanations.

Once again.

AS SOON AS YOU GET TO A FRAGMENT THAT YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND OR THAT YOU DO NOT AGREE WITH, JUST WRITE ME A NOTE AND I WILL GIVE YOU ADDITIONAL EXPLANATIONS !!!
 

topsquark

Forum Staff
Apr 2008
2,935
610
On the dance floor, baby!
Or you could just, I don't know, answer the questions that have been brought up.

Thread closed.

-Dan
 
Status
Not open for further replies.