Arhimedes ( Energy is able be support point)

MMM

Below post is very simple please stuy I showed all facts
( You can confirm in books ) TOPIC is interdyscyplinary but is very simple

EM RADIATION IS PUSHING OBJECTS **********************************

James Clerk Maxwell, in 1861–64, published his theory of electromagnetic fields and radiation, which shows that light has momentum and thus can exert pressure on objects. Maxwell's equations provide the theoretical foundation for sailing with light pressure. So by 1864, the physics community and beyond knew sunlight carried momentum that would exert a pressure on objects.
and proven experimentally ( 1900 - 1901)
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_sail

****************************

ARCHIMEDES TOLD :
Give me support point I will move up Earth

MAROSZ 2014
Dear Archimees You can support Your tool by ENERGY
( EM RADIATION , PLACE WHERE 3D ENERGY STRATED LIVE =GOOD SUPPORT)

Joul / Cubic Meter = Newton * meter / cubic meter = N/m^2 ( PASSCAL !!!)

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-_oBxnPs5aWM/U-3RRFVAHVI/AAAAAAAAB4E/gFDtM5iC50o/s1600/CIMG3284.JPG

1600 Gallileo relativity hypothesis and Naturall Fall Law
1686 Newton ( Gravitation Law - Grav. mass def. ) F = ma ( Inertial Mass )

1861 Maxwell ( EM radiation problem )

1905 - Einstein copied Newton and Copied Gallileo without modyf. His target was use mathematica to rope all in one

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-XOxE9OYcVys/VP1HK3fFPgI/AAAAAAAACQc/EnJXXu4d2lg/s1600/CIMG3541.JPG

AFTER STUDY ABOVE PICTURE PLEASE prepare A-A surface model for Earth and SUN ( why Earth is making rotation respect to own axis 66.66 do You see that energy is able give torque to big Earth
Earth started rotation but can You ? or not ? show me on SKY object that will start ideal opposite rotation to Earth

Torque M1 but where is -M1 where is famous III Newton ? how to wrote mV equation to have Left = Right ) below my blog = only first small step to solve many new problems

I'm happy that You are here ( We are here ) Question about problem it is good start .... ( ON above drawing I showed bulb sometimes Energy have Dark colour ( wave leght) and Astronomers have huge problem to recognize that They are waching on EM RAIATION -- THEY ARE LOOKING MASS ? or RADIATION ? )

EN http://youtu.be/Bw-AZ_nTqEk

TEST THAT I MADE IN 2012 POLAND ( my private flat )
PROBLEM's HISTORY
below words wrote Gallileo near 400 years ago (I marked important part (red))

" Galileo postulated his relativity hypothesis: any two observers moving at constant speed and direction with respect to one another will obtain the same results for all mechanical experiments (it is understood that the apparatuses they use for these experiments move with them).

This idea has a very important consequence: velocity is not absolute. This means that velocity can only be measured in reference to some object(s), and that the result of this measurment changes if we decide to measure the velocity with respect to a diferent refernce point(s). Imagine an observer traveling inside a windowless spaceship moving away from the sun at constant velocity. Galileo asserted that there are no mechanical experiments that can be made inside the rocket that will tell the occupants that the rocket is moving .

The question are we moving'' has no meaning unless we specify a reference frame (are we moving with respect to that star'' is meaningful). This fact, formulated in the 1600's remains very true today and is one of the cornerstones of Einstein's theories of relativity."

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-mfX1X9yDqDw/VLuo2Th_6_I/AAAAAAAACNQ/YaGD36e4PRk/s1600/mar.jpg

"one another will obtain the same results for all mechanical experiments (it is understood that the apparatuses they use for these experiments move with them) This idea has a very important consequence: velocity is not absolute."

MAROSZ (me ) - Maxwell 1861 showed NEW TYPE important mechanical experiment !
EM radiation ( EM preasure is giving force to objects proportional to object's speed respect to point where signal started ! Important is Iverse Square Law) GALLILEO and NEWTON not wrote absolute true in physics

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-PqEJjEZQisM/UKjVcJCGp9I/AAAAAAAAALs/0XOxA_hceK4/s1600/wwwwwwwwwwwww.JPG

HOW BIG FORCE WILL REGISTER FRONT WALL INSIDE AIRPLANE A and B ?
THE SAME ? or NOT THE SAME ? TO be or Not To be for Relativity !!!

bulb is the same ( the same power = the same experiment )
airplanes are the same ( size )
airplanes are not accelerate and not slowing down joust fall

FORCE ? it is not problem SPEED C and TIME it is Iverse Square Law and information where signal started and where the signal will hit wall !!!
( camera (sensor) and source (bulb) are moving with airplanes ( zero outside observation we can cover windows by dark material ) !

ChipB

PHF Helper
MMM said:
why Earth is making rotation respect to own axis 66.66 do You see that energy is able give torque to big Earth - please ask Your self : Earth started rotation but can You ? or not ? show me on SKY object that will start ideal opposite rotation to Earth

Torque M1 but where is -M1 where is famous III Newton ? how to wrote mV equation to have Left = Right ) below my blog = only first small step to solve many new problems
Marosz: I have avoided responding to most of your previous posts because you are simply regurgitating the same old nonsense. But this is a new topic, so I will address it.

The "source" of the rotational momentum of the Earth, and indeed of the entire solar system - is thought to come from the initial momentum of all the particles that were part of the primordial dust and gas cloud that the solar system was formed from. From Newton's first law that initial momentum must be conserved - which is why all planets orbit in the same direction around the sun, and the sun and all planets (except 1) rotate in the same direction, and the orbits of the planets all lie very close to a common plane, called the ecliptic. It's all a consequence of that initial state of angular momentum. (The one planet that rotates backwards - Uranus - is thought to do so due because of a major impact early in its life that tilted its axis by over 90 degrees from the ecliptic plane.) It is an interesting question whether the sum of all angular momentuums of all palnet systems and galaxies in the universe add to zero. It is unknown whether the initial monentum imparted from the Big Bang had zero angular momentum, but if it did then we should see that the rotation of galaxies should cancel out. There is some evidence that galactic rotations are essentially random, so that it may indeed be true that the sum of all angular momentum in the universe, but this is still a matter of some debate.

If you think that Earth rotates because of an imbalance of EM pressure on the Earth imparted from the sun, you have to answer this question: what causes the sun to rotate? And why do all planets orbit and rotate in the same direction? And why do all galaxies rotate?

Last edited:

MMM

Dear Chip B

Problem 1 + problem 2 = Reason

below I showing SI units system [very old knowlege and huge tradition ]

Simple Energy's Density

Joul / cubic meter = Newton * meter / cubic meter = N/m^2

for Each Engineer Pascal [N/m^2 ] and Surface [m^2] = FORCE !

SUN

Earth

Earth's radius is HUGE ( even small force is able chage Earth's torque )

Inverse Square Law ( old greece )

If distance rise Joules /m^2 are going down and Joules / m^3 also are going down (^3 in mathematica it is very strong relation )

Please Evaluate ENERGY's Density below I marked A-A SURFACE

IN MY POST I SHOWING THAT

ENERGY ( EM RADIATiON ) can change EARTH TORQUE !

SUN IS ABLE CHAGE ANY PLANET TORQUE but SUN NO NEED CHANGE OWN TORQUE !!!

below I showng Bulb and two Screen
below drawing is symetry but bulb can have asymetry position

symetry bulb position
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-_oBxnPs5aWM/U-3RRFVAHVI/AAAAAAAAB4E/gFDtM5iC50o/s1600/CIMG3284.JPG

asymetry bulb position (not one axis )

Screen
.........................BULB ......................
...........................................................Screen

Bulb will not start rotation EM RADIATION = 3D ball but asymetry situation SCREENS = TORQUE M1 !!!

NASA and Nobody is 100 % sure why mV exist but engine is not giving opposite to motion reaction

Oryginal NASA's SERVER

NASA's raport http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20140006052

in 2012 I made simple test

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-spFELf_xcJ0/U_CBPKLmCEI/AAAAAAAAB5M/FfYELmw3M6c/s1600/pytanie1.jpg

about my idea how works EM drive

http://youtu.be/cSsTWRt0VBA

PEOPLE WHO LIKE EINSTEIN SPECULATE NEW THEORY ABOUT EMdrive
QUANTUM SPACE FLUCTUATION !!! ???

WE HAVE IN PHYSICS SMALL PROBLEM

1600 Gallileo relativity hypothesis and Naturall Fall Law
1686 Newton ( Gravitation Law - Grav. mass def. ) F = ma ( Inertial Mass )

1861 Maxwell ( EM radiation problem )

James Clerk Maxwell, in 1861–64, published his theory of electromagnetic fields and radiation, which shows that light has momentum and thus can exert pressure on objects. Maxwell's equations provide the theoretical foundation for sailing with light pressure. So by 1864, the physics community and beyond knew sunlight carried momentum that would exert a pressure on objects.

and proven experimentally ( 1900 - 1901)

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_sail

1905 - Einstein copied Newton and Copied Gallileo without modyf. His target was use mathematica to rope all facts in one EINSTEIN NOT CHANGE NEWTON !!!

DO YOU ACCEPT HISTORY ?
YOU MUST ACCEPT THAT EINSTEIN COPIED WRONG FACTS !!!

I WANT TO SPEAK BELOW ABOUT EQVIVALENCE PRINCIPLE !!!

very simple we can find different between Gravit. Mass an inertial Mass
for Inertial mass ( F=ma ) not important is body's SIZE !!!

For gravitation body's size is very important !!!

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-m-WIVL5kgjQ/VO7Q_KoK9JI/AAAAAAAACOo/7dXH_64PxIQ/s1600/1pl.jpg

( gravitation = ENERGY )

Joul /cubic meter = Newton * meter /cubic meter = N/m^2 ( Passcal )

YOU CAN NOT SIMULATE GRAVITATION !!!

GRAVITATION IT IS NOT ACCELERATION !!!

Last edited:

MMM

PROBLEM's HISTORY
below words wrote Gallileo near 400 years ago (I marked important part (red))

" Galileo postulated his relativity hypothesis: any two observers moving at constant speed and direction with respect to one another will obtain the same results for all mechanical experiments(it is understood that the apparatuses they use for these experiments move with them).
This idea has a very important consequence: velocity is not absolute. This means that velocity can only be measured in reference to some object(s), and that the result of this measurment changes if we decide to measure the velocity with respect to a diferent refernce point(s). Imagine an observer traveling inside a windowless spaceship moving away from the sun at constant velocity. Galileo asserted that there are no mechanical experiments that can be made inside the rocket that will tell the occupants that the rocket is moving .

The question are we moving'' has no meaning unless we specify a reference frame (are we moving with respect to that star'' is meaningful). This fact, formulated in the 1600's remains very true today and is one of the cornerstones of Einstein's theories of relativity."

James Clerk Maxwell, in 1861–64, published his theory of electromagnetic fields and radiation, which shows that light has momentum and thus can exert pressure on objects. Maxwell's equations provide the theoretical foundation for sailing with light pressure. So by 1864, the physics community and beyond knew sunlight carried momentum that would exert a pressure on objects.

and proven experimentally ( 1900 - 1901)

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_sail

MAROSZ 2012 I MADE IN HOME VERY SIMPLE TEST

"one another will obtain the same results for all mechanical experiments (it is understood that the apparatuses they use for these experiments move with them) This idea has a very important consequence: velocity is not absolute."

MAROSZ (me )

- Maxwell 1861 showed NEW TYPE important mechanical experiment !

EM radiation ( EM preasure is giving force to objects proportional to object's speed respect to point where signal started ! Important is Iverse Square Law and FACT THAT NOT EXIST C+V)

HOW BIG FORCE WILL REGISTER FRONT WALL INSIDE AIRPLANE A and B ?THE SAME ? or NOT THE SAME ? TO be or Not To be for Relativity !!!

bulb is the same ( the same power = the same experiment )
airplanes are the same ( size )
airplanes are not accelerate and not slowing down joust fall

FORCE ? it is not problem SPEED C and TIME it is Iverse Square Law and information where signal started and where the signal will hit wall !!!
( camera (sensor) and source (bulb) are moving with airplanes ( zero outside observation we can cover windows by dark material ) !

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-PqEJjEZQisM/UKjVcJCGp9I/AAAAAAAAALs/0XOxA_hceK4/s1600/wwwwwwwwwwwww.JPG

GALLILEO's HYPOTHESIS = FALSE

we can solve relative motion problmem by classical Experiment

GALLILEO's HYPOTHESIS = FALSE ====> WE NO NEED SRT and GRT

FIRST TEST I MADE IN MY FLAT ( POLAND CITY WALBRZYCH )
during my test I spoke with MR MURRAY ( USA ) - phone

one picture
bulb -----------camera >>> 30 km/s

rotation 180 degree

one picture
camera -----------bulb >>> 30 km/s

FIRST TEST I MADE 3 pictures + 3 pictures

topsquark

Forum Staff
Look, I like the energy and enthusiasm that you are putting into this. However it would seem to me that the reason so many of your threads are hard to understand is that they are, well, hard to understand.

I'm going to make a suggestion. Please take a bit of extra time when you post. Write out what you are trying to say instead of posting a list of "bullet points." (Quick little comments on a overhead projector that organize a live talk.) Pick your topic and explain it. If you need a diagram inserted then limit the diagram to one topic, not three or four disconnected ones.

One of the traits that a good Scientist must learn is how to communicate their ideas. I realize that posting in English is a bit of a task for you, but you typically do a pretty good job. Organizing your posts will go a long way in helping you communicate more effectively.

Please rewrite this post and keep my suggestion in mind for any future posts.

-Dan

MMM

I prepered picture presentation

EM RADIATION = PREASURE ( pascall )
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-BHgIIFU8ON8/VP_zX3KcL3I/AAAAAAAACQ8/5nk25md2wEk/s1600/CIMG3705.JPG

For Example You and Me are Engineers
We are preparing NANO STRUCTURES or ( we building very small machine NANO scale )

I'm in POLAND

HOW HEAVY IS YOUR AND MY TOOL ?

( for me physics it is very practical knowledge ( that is the reason why I wrote we must ADD NORMAL EM RADIATION to physics )

NEXT PROBLEM IS HOW BIG SURFACE HAS GOT YOUR TOOL ?

EM RADIATION IS HITING EARTH LIKE RAIN - How many water will hit Your body during rotation inside rain
how big surface in one sec. feel water , Hz ? )

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-UxFVJ7wT-ws/VP_5Lvbl38I/AAAAAAAACRs/s1RC6huKwRY/s1600/CIMG3699.JPG

NEXT PROBLEM THAT I SEE
( how fast is Your tool and Motion Direction ( Your tool escape from energy or Intensity is rising ? )

mass m is registering not the same Joules nomber <--- V or ----> V

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-XOxE9OYcVys/VP1HK3fFPgI/AAAAAAAACQc/EnJXXu4d2lg/s1600/CIMG3541.JPG

NEXT PROBLEM HOW FAST IS LAB and direction

OK For example You and me Love physics ?

I will ask You very simple CAN YOU SIMULATE Gravitation by ACCELERATION

Gravitation = Energy [joul ]
space = Cubic metres

Why I asking about acceleration ? ( I wrote that You and me love physics ! EQVIVALENCE ? or NOT )

when Airplane want to chage fly's direction
pilot is changing preasure near wing

Joul / cubic meter = Newton * meter / cubic meter = N/m^2 PASSCAL

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-QR4VjTowlG4/VP_5PKSEhEI/AAAAAAAACR0/IrcMPvhMd0o/s1600/CIMG3704.JPG

In universe exist "N " stars exist also many moons ( moon not giving ENERGY but Energy is hiting moon and backing to place where started )

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-9QfHhbdcroQ/VP_0TYmE3NI/AAAAAAAACRE/FTe_jaMhcGo/s1600/CIMG3700.JPG

ENERGY's DENSITY and EM PREASURE are proportional !!!

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-_oBxnPs5aWM/U-3RRFVAHVI/AAAAAAAAB4E/gFDtM5iC50o/s1600/CIMG3284.JPG

BULB IS PUSHING mass m by ENERGY but mass m will not push bulb opposite to own motion !!! ( III Newton )

m----------------bulb---------------m >>> motion
...........................p1

bulb started signal in point p1
point p1 = center for 3D wave ( it is stationary point in space Energy started live in that point )

m----------------bulb---------------m >>> motion
...........................p1
........m----------------bulb---------------m >>> motion

Where Bulb Started 3D signal ?
How big force will register mass m ?

situation A

m----------------bulb---------------m >>> 30 km/s ( respect to point p1)
...........................p1
........m----------------bulb---------------m >>>30km/s

situation B

m----------------bulb---------------m >>>100 km/s (respect to point p1)
...........................p1
..............................m----------------bulb---------------m >>>100 km/s

MANY PEOPLE UNDERSTAND FAMOUS EXAMPLE
person inside train

I'm moving or station ?

(I'm sory in my ilustration are small mistake C - brighthess ( camera is registering Joul/ mm^2 INTENSITY !!! )

You schould see my mistake with sign "<" or ">" for me important is day when I made below ilustration ( I can not edit )

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-NIRPGlmY9Tw/Ualtt_yXisI/AAAAAAAAA7w/IKotONfnhD8/s1600/compass.JPG

more of my Job You can see belwo
( 3 years I'm studing my simple test )

camera ----------bulb >>> 30 km/s

bulb----------camera >>> 30km/s

camera is not registering the same brightness !!! Camera is not registering the same EM RADIATION LEVEL !!!

Camera's wall feel not the same FORCE !!!

Joul /cubic meter = Newton * meter / cubic meter = N/m^2 ( passcal )

space [ cubic meter ]]

http://maroszphysics.blogspot.com

Last edited:

MBW

You seem to be saying EM radiation is everywhere, and defines a stationary frame of reference against which all other motion can be measured.
This seems very similar to the old luminiferous_aether theory.

Another point you touch upon is the Equivalence_principle,
which is one of the founding postulates of Einstein's Theories.
I have certainly seen this question raised in several physics articles.
The general impression I have got from these articles seems to be that:
While the fundamental underlying reason for them to be equivalent is obscure,
they do seem to be absolutely identical (as closely as can be determined by any experiment performed to date).

My own personal thinking on this is that the reason they seem to be identical is because they are in fact exactly the same thing
(just viewed from a different perspective).

Last edited:

MMM

You seem to be saying EM radiation is everywhere, and defines a stationary frame of reference against which all other motion can be measured.
This seems very similar to the old luminiferous_aether theory.
NO please try unerstand below example

EXAMPLE
we are in vacuum ( ZERO EM RADATION OUTSIDE ) We are far far in space
You are inside rocket ( 100% dark windows - zero outside observations - )

You have bulb huge power
and distance L = 3000 meter
Bulb is ideal in center

rear wall------L---------BULB------L------------front wall >>> motion ?
.....................................p1

You turned on/off BULB ( FLASH - we can use hydrogen and small explosion ) master energy MOLS)

Fact 1
the bulb started 3D signal in point P1

Fact 2
point P1 = point where rocket was in past it is not real object ( joust point in space )
( short time after 3D signal started rocket changed position)

3D signal = EM RADIATION = ENERGY

Joul / cubic meter = Newton * meter / cubic meter = N/m^2 ( pascall )

*****************************************************************************
James Clerk Maxwell, in 1861–64, published his theory of electromagnetic fields and radiation, which shows that light has momentum and thus can exert pressure on objects. Maxwell's equations provide the theoretical foundation for sailing with light pressure. So by 1864, the physics community and beyond knew sunlight carried momentum that would exert a pressure on objects.

and proven experimentally ( 1900 - 1901)

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_sail

*****************************************************************************

***************************************************
PROBLEM's HISTORY
below words wrote Gallileo near 400 years ago (I marked important part (red))

" Galileo postulated his relativity hypothesis: any two observers moving at constant speed and direction with respect to one another will obtain the same results for all mechanical experiments(it is understood that the apparatuses they use for these experiments move with them).
This idea has a very important consequence: velocity is not absolute. This means that velocity can only be measured in reference to some object(s), and that the result of this measurment changes if we decide to measure the velocity with respect to a diferent refernce point(s). Imagine an observer traveling inside a windowless spaceship moving away from the sun at constant velocity. Galileo asserted that there are no mechanical experiments that can be made inside the rocket that will tell the occupants that the rocket is moving .

The question are we moving'' has no meaning unless we specify a reference frame (are we moving with respect to that star'' is meaningful). This fact, formulated in the 1600's remains very true today and is one of the cornerstones of Einstein's theories of relativity."
*************************************************

MAROSZ (me )

MR MAXWELL SHOWED CLASSICAL MECHANICA EXPERIMENT
I WANT TO USE HIS FACT ! GALLILEO did't knew about EM radiation

1600 Gallileo relativity hypothesis and Naturall Fall Law

1861 Maxwell ( EM radiation problem )

OK ENERGY STARTED IN POINT p1 !
Point p1 it is not real object but it is place in space where 3D signal started !

HOW BIG EM RADIATION WILL REGISTER FRONT AND REAR WALL !!!

rear wall------L---------BULB------L------------front wall >>> motion ?
.....................................p1

short time later

...........rear wall------L---------BULB------L------------front wall >>>

please prepare graph ( Inverse Square Law - point p1 = zero )

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-mfX1X9yDqDw/VLuo2Th_6_I/AAAAAAAACNQ/YaGD36e4PRk/s1600/mar.jpg

conclusion

Relative hypothesis ( 1600 Gallileo) is wrong

I can solve MR Gallileo's problem

1905 ??? why we have relative theory ???

Another point you touch upon is the Equivalence_principle,
which is one of the founding postulates of Einstein's Theories.
I have certainly seen this question raised in several physics articles.
The general impression I have got from these articles seems to be that:
While the fundamental underlying reason for them to be equivalent is obscure,
they do seem to be absolutely identical (as closely as can be determined by any experiment performed to date).

Look below

My own personal thinking on this is that the reason they seem to be identical is because they are in fact exactly the same thing
(just viewed from a different perspective).

???

I have question are you able read different we have the same mass m and rope ( how big tension is registering rope ? inside rocket exist only Acceleration on Planet we have ENERGY - RADIATION !!! )

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-RB7pLDZ_K8o/VPrQTc1jGsI/AAAAAAAACPQ/chMgcUhsIdY/s1600/CIMG3521.JPG

What You think about Natural Fall Law ?

1905 - Einstein copied Newton and Copied Gallileo without modyf.
Einstein's target was rope all old facts in one not Wrote New physics !!!

Michelson Morley Marosz ( EM RADIATION PREASURE EDITION !!! )

FORCE is ABSOLUTE !!! I not ask in my test about C and TIME !! I'm using
other relations !!

Joul / cubic metres !!!

VERY FRESH PROBLEM FOR NASA !!!

NASA's raport http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20140006052

right now not Exist Official Opinion how works engine ( why we not registering opposite to motion reaction ! III NEWTON LAW )

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-_oBxnPs5aWM/U-3RRFVAHVI/AAAAAAAAB4E/gFDtM5iC50o/s1600/CIMG3284.JPG

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-spFELf_xcJ0/U_CBPKLmCEI/AAAAAAAAB5M/FfYELmw3M6c/s1600/pytanie1.jpg

Where Energy Started ? Where Energy will hit Stellite ?

Please evaluate ( 45 degrees EMdrive situation ) My questionis how big speed respect to point where signal started must have sattelite to not register EM PREASURE !!! ???

IN UNIVERSE EXIST MANY STARTS CAN WE FIND two stars and object 45 degrees ???

Last edited:

topsquark

Forum Staff
Marosz: This is what I mean. Answer the question. Don't just repeat everything! You are not communicating anything like this.

-Dan