Go Back   Physics Help Forum > College/University Physics Help > Special and General Relativity

Special and General Relativity Special and General Relativity Physics Help Forum

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Woody
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jun 10th 2017, 11:10 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 6
Process linked to gravity affecting mass-energy

Please, better see v2 pdf file attached to message posted june 20


ABSTRACT
The proposal assumes that the distortion of space-time due to relative velocity (Special Relativity), and the distortion of space-time produced by gravitational fields (General Relativity) are linked to changes of state that affect to mass-energy.
The hypothesis proposes the existence of a process linked to gravity, this phenomenon would affect mass-energy. It would be required to add an additional condition (being a more restrictive scenario) keeping the field equations that define space-time curvature, but by adding the condition linked to the proposed phenomenon, the trajectory that would follow mass-energy in that curved space-time, changes with respect to the established by the officially accepted model. The effect is negligible if the distortion of space-time caused by a gravitational field does not have a significant value. The hypothesis proposed allows to calculate mathematically the discrepancy that would exist with respect to the current model. In case of being correct, the proposal would have important implications in diverse areas of science and its effect would be determinant in the study of black holes or questions related to Cosmology.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf process linked to gravity.pdf (272.9 KB, 5 views)

Last edited by santiugarte; Jun 20th 2017 at 03:36 AM. Reason: Removed e-mail link
santiugarte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 10th 2017, 05:28 PM   #2
Forum Admin
 
topsquark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: On the dance floor, baby!
Posts: 2,117
Originally Posted by santiugarte View Post
pdf file attached
if you are interested in the proposed hypothesis, please contact me

ABSTRACT
The proposal assumes that the distortion of space-time due to relative velocity (Special Relativity), and the distortion of space-time produced by gravitational fields (General Relativity) are linked to changes of state that affect to mass-energy.
The hypothesis proposes the existence of a process linked to gravity, this phenomenon would affect mass-energy. It would be required to add an additional condition (being a more restrictive scenario) keeping the field equations that define space-time curvature, but by adding the condition linked to the proposed phenomenon, the trajectory that would follow mass-energy in that curved space-time, changes with respect to the established by the officially accepted model. The effect is negligible if the distortion of space-time caused by a gravitational field does not have a significant value. The hypothesis proposed allows to calculate mathematically the discrepancy that would exist with respect to the current model. In case of being correct, the proposal would have important implications in diverse areas of science and its effect would be determinant in the study of black holes or questions related to Cosmology.
I haven't perused the paper (or, in fact, the abstract) so my comment has nothing to do with the content.

I have deleted the line where you supplied your e-mail address. It's just a bad idea to post them openly. Any members that want to speak to you can do it on the open Forum or in a PM.

-Dan
__________________
I'm a "something shiny" kind of...Oh look! Something shiny!

See the forum rules here.
topsquark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 11th 2017, 11:01 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 10
Sounds interesting. Thank you for posting about your ideas. I'm reading the paper, and will be glad to offer thoughts if I understand.
RonSpain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 13th 2017, 02:46 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Woody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: England
Posts: 262
I have had a quick look and at first glance there seem to be some interesting ideas.
However at several points I found it difficult to follow your arguments and eventually gave up.

Some of the steps in your arguments which are unambiguous are stated clearly but then re-iterated sometimes several times, perhaps unnecessarily so at some points.
Other steps seem to be larger leaps, which are much less clearly and unambiguously stated.

Be careful to ensure that any terms you introduce are clearly defined.

Be careful with your English, I am guessing it is not your first language.
In physics certain terms that might be used in casually spoken English take on a more specific meaning.
For example you refer to Energy being "consumed by the process".
This has implications of the energy being used up and lost.
Possibly a better term would be "absorbed by the process".
This has the implied meaning that the energy is only temporarily bound up by the process, and it can be released by the reverse process.

Also I think the use of endothermic and exothermic is not quite right in this context.
In my understanding these terms are specific to Heat (in chemical reactions) rather than energy in general.

I expect that there is terminology in physics for processes that absorb or emit energy,
however I have to admit I don't know it.
Anyone else out there able to help out with this terminology?
topsquark likes this.
__________________
~\o/~

Last edited by Woody; Jun 13th 2017 at 02:52 PM.
Woody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 14th 2017, 10:07 AM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 6
In relation to reiteration, I would rather prefer a 5-10 pages paper, and indeed tried to summarize it (in fact some issues are not included like the impact on the Heisemberg uncertainty principle or some calculation corresponding with discrepancies), but faced the need to define in detail issues corresponding to new concepts, for example using different references, or the expression that relates both states (that might be a bit reiterative). Certainly if those effects corresponding to the proposed process were already well known issues, less than five pages would be required.
Finally, I would appreciate if you express the issues that are not clear enough or that you consider should be better explainned. I will try to do it, if it is possible for me.
santiugarte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 14th 2017, 10:09 AM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 6
I was considering using the term absorb, maybe it is more suitable as you say. Endothermic term is used as the process would take place at the expense of taking energy from the system (“The term endothermic process describes a process or reaction in which the system absorbs energy from its surroundings; usually, but not always, in the form of heat.”). Note: the term Absorbs is included in this definition of endothermic process.
santiugarte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 14th 2017, 10:11 AM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 6
So adding the proposed process would have an effect like the corresponding to an external force considering the established model, but I do not think that “external force” is the suitable term to describe the proposed phenomenon, because it should be rather considered as an intrinsec phenomenon of nature. That is the equivalent of using the term “free fall”, I had problems using the established concepts and terms to introduce a new phenomenon. Introducing new ideas or phenomena might not only change the equations but also the terms used to describe some established concepts. Altough at the end what really matters is if the hypothesis describes the physical system better that the current model, because then terms can be easily adapted with no major problems.
santiugarte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 20th 2017, 03:34 AM   #8
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 6
v2 of the paper “Process linked to gravity affecting mass-energy”

The proposed Hypothesis adds a new condition, so it can not be deduced from the currently established model. This v2 tries to better clarify the reasons or arguments that point towards that additional condition (not need to read v1).
The proposed process is the one that fits the behaviour of the Physical System to the features it shows considering the approach taken at this paper. This approach implies an invariant value: ndt=n´dτ
The consequence of the process will be a force opposed to the free fall, which would be negligible insofar distortion of time does not reach a siginificant value.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf v2process linked to gravity.pdf (301.4 KB, 0 views)
santiugarte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 27th 2017, 07:00 AM   #9
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 6
Attached is a pdf file "presentation process linked to gravity"
Attached Files
File Type: pdf presentation process linked to gravity.pdf (391.0 KB, 2 views)
santiugarte is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  Physics Help Forum > College/University Physics Help > Special and General Relativity

Tags
affecting, gravity, linked, massenergy, process, relativity



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Physics Forum Discussions
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Confusions about reversible process and state variable in non-quasi-static process. goodphy Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics 1 Jun 29th 2017 04:47 PM
Fluid to increase force under same gravity and mass crowxe Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics 4 May 25th 2017 01:26 PM
Gravity – Energy of the Future sentally Energy and Work 4 Jul 5th 2016 07:37 AM
Mass Gravity and Photons MBW Special and General Relativity 4 Dec 23rd 2015 01:30 PM
Unsure of the name of mass transfer process chakari Advanced Thermodynamics 2 Sep 18th 2013 01:45 PM


Facebook Twitter Google+ RSS Feed