Go Back   Physics Help Forum > College/University Physics Help > Special and General Relativity

Special and General Relativity Special and General Relativity Physics Help Forum

Like Tree3Likes
  • 1 Post By HallsofIvy
  • 1 Post By ChipB
  • 1 Post By Woody
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jul 31st 2016, 06:22 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 48
Puzzle number not existence

When number is more than thirty two digits(out of number digit maximum), it is not number and just the puzzle so not existence as one itself. But infinite series is number as existence even the digit is longer more than it as it is with other number as formula.
philipishin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 1st 2016, 05:36 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Woody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: England
Posts: 323
How accurate does a number need to be?
How many digits are required to adequately represent reality?
How big does the biggest number have to be to sensibly describe the universe?

During a slow day at work, a colleague and I decided to see what "practical" use the huge number googol (10^100) might be put to.
We calculated that the volume of the observable universe is somewhere roughly around about a googol cubic angstrom units.

It has been argued that the Planck length is the shortest possible measurable length.
You might like to work out the dimensions of the (observable) universe in terms of the Planck length,
and thus estimate how many digits are required to completely describe the cosmos,
I am not that bored at the moment.
Woody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 18th 2016, 01:49 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 232
Originally Posted by philipishin View Post
When number is more than thirty two digits(out of number digit maximum), it is not number and just the puzzle so not existence as one itself. But infinite series is number as existence even the digit is longer more than it as it is with other number as formula.
I have absolutely no idea what this means. Woody, if you know what it means could you please enlighten me?
HallsofIvy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23rd 2016, 09:49 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Woody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: England
Posts: 323
I always find the posts of philipishin more or less incomprehensible.

What I generally do is make up my own question, based on the words he uses, which might be a plausible interpretation of what he means.

I also try to make up an interpretation which will allow me to make, what I hope other people might consider to be, an interesting reply.
If the reply actually answers the original post, that is a bonus...

I chose to interpret the original post in this case as leaning toward the "is the universe a simulation" question and geared my answer accordingly.
Woody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27th 2016, 03:13 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 232
I am puzzled at the specific "32 digits". Of course, 32= 4(8) so I wonder if philipishin was not referring to a "long" (4 bytes so 32 bits) data type in Pascal.
topsquark likes this.
HallsofIvy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 28th 2016, 12:40 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Woody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: England
Posts: 323
PhilipIshin started a thread with a vaguely similar theme here:
physics formula from the number

Maybe one day he will find a better interpretation package and we can have a proper conversation.

One might suppose he is using the readily available Google translate.
Can anyone recommend a better package?
Woody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29th 2016, 07:12 AM   #7
Physics Team
 
ChipB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Naperville, IL USA
Posts: 2,269
Google does a pretty good job, though it often comes up with an incorrect word or two. Based on the way philipishin's posts are always unreadable, I have come to the conclusion that he is basically a troll, stringing random thoughts together into sentences. Note that he very rarely responds to requests for clarification.
topsquark likes this.
ChipB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 31st 2016, 02:04 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Woody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: England
Posts: 323
I came to the similar impression that "he" is a chatbot!
Does he pass the Turing Test?
topsquark likes this.
Woody is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  Physics Help Forum > College/University Physics Help > Special and General Relativity

Tags
existence, number, puzzle



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Physics Forum Discussions
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reynold Number ling233 Advanced Mechanics 6 Jan 24th 2016 04:57 AM
Stanton number jinxy1985 Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics 1 Feb 19th 2014 10:38 AM
The existence of the universe physics philipishin Philosophy of Physics 7 Jan 15th 2014 04:07 PM
Missing energy puzzle fuzzylogic Advanced Electricity and Magnetism 2 Oct 21st 2011 02:51 AM
Geniuses, Help Me To Crack This "Big Sizes" Number Puzzle wustvn General Physics 5 Nov 19th 2008 06:38 AM


Facebook Twitter Google+ RSS Feed