Physics Help Forum Unobserved(stateless/unphysical) Quantum Waves + State (physicality) = Spacetime (GR)

 Physics Physics Forum - General Physics Discussion and Physics News

 Sep 22nd 2019, 05:56 AM #1 Junior Member   Join Date: Aug 2019 Posts: 2 Unobserved(stateless/unphysical) Quantum Waves + State (physicality) = Spacetime (GR) Unobserved waves are unphysical, but ones with state change experience duality and get spacetime involved. Observation doesn't always mean Quantum Observation. What matters is if a state change happens. State is a binary physicality variable. I'm now questioning if it's even necessary to declare observation is involved in the double slit. It's accepted that observation means measurement ..but all the experiment cares about is a waves state change while its moving (and is allowed to continue moving). Observation would just be something that occurred after the experiment was over. It didn't influence the outcome. A wave would never reach something able to change its state ..unless there were two instances of state changes in its path (which-way eraser). I found a new quantum trick the unobservable is able to achieve. While a new wave formulates, it is able to know if its state will change during its journey ..before it even starts to move. The unobservable is all time, all the time for a physicality variables. Unobserved quantum waves not having spacetime is a very big deal. Without time from spacetime, its life is instantaneous. The delayed choice quantum eraser demonstrates this. The only way the first entangled particle knows if the partner will ever be observed is if the state is known for the life of both entangled particles. Is quantum which-way information the real cause? Which-way has nothing to do with it. The final panel is wave collapse and doesn't effect the outcome like a state change does. I figured out what is happening in an experiment that is "erasing" the "which-way" (with a polarizer). A Double slit with opposite polarizers ..and then an extra polarizer down the line acting as a "eraser"; State (physicality) of a particle is decided while it's being created. State changes are detected preemptively. When two detectors are in its path, its state would be changing twice. In this case, the particle is sent as an unobserved wave. What we are witnessing is what happens when a quantum wave actually goes through double slits and do not interact with polarizers. Proving that a polarizer only effects physical photon light because a single state change would have sent a physical photon at the double slits to go through a single slit. I asked the forbidden question in physics and found a bridge to reality. or should I say it's a bridge to the simulation? Spacetime may be an analog simulation built on the quantum field. It doesn't make any sense for light to have a speed limit. Spacetime must have a frame rate. If Spacetime is a simulation, State is the object being added to the program. Perhaps the frame rate is based off the speed something can be observed. Somewhere around 0.3 μm (micrometers) naturally gives a object a physical state. This is the distance light can travel in a femtosecond. This would mean spacetime has a frame rate of 1,000,000,000,000,000 frames per second. Don't bring up Planck, it isn't the size that determines if something is automatically physical. The Higgs Field is nothing special. It's just another field in the Quantum Field that interacts with Spacetime when the object needs to be physical. Black holes spaghettify matter and turn its physicality state off. Dark matter is matter that doesn't have the ability to have a physical state. Black holes are not deleting information, it's just making it unobservable. The holographic principle sounded like a long shot anyways.
 Sep 23rd 2019, 02:08 AM #2 Senior Member   Join Date: Oct 2017 Location: Glasgow Posts: 474 topsquark likes this.
Sep 23rd 2019, 09:58 AM   #3

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: On the dance floor, baby!
Posts: 2,856
 Originally Posted by scifimath Observation doesn't always mean Quantum Observation.
Properly addressing the misconceptions here would probably fill a book. I'll stick with this comment for now.

What is the difference between quantum observation and observation?

-Dan
__________________
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

See the forum rules here.

 Sep 23rd 2019, 07:21 PM #4 Junior Member     Join Date: Sep 2019 Location: CN GX WZ Posts: 20 I'm also learning to write novels. For reference only Combining the reviewing experience of some science fiction editors Good writers don't usually come up with all their ideas at once. They will slowly unfold a profound idea in the book. Instead of using it all at once.

 Tags physicality, quantum, spacetime, state, waves

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Similar Physics Forum Discussions Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Juanchotutata Quantum Physics 0 May 6th 2018 08:49 AM pittsburghjoe Philosophy of Physics 11 Aug 2nd 2017 06:31 PM fergal Quantum Physics 1 Jan 17th 2017 08:28 AM kiwiheretic Quantum Physics 11 Jul 6th 2015 06:12 PM saman_1810 Quantum Physics 0 Jul 13th 2009 03:58 AM