Go Back   Physics Help Forum > Physics Forums > Physics

Physics Physics Forum - General Physics Discussion and Physics News

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By benit13
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Sep 22nd 2019, 05:56 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 2
Lightbulb Unobserved(stateless/unphysical) Quantum Waves + State (physicality) = Spacetime (GR)

Unobserved waves are unphysical, but ones with state change experience duality and get spacetime involved. Observation doesn't always mean Quantum Observation. What matters is if a state change happens. State is a binary physicality variable. I'm now questioning if it's even necessary to declare observation is involved in the double slit. It's accepted that observation means measurement ..but all the experiment cares about is a waves state change while its moving (and is allowed to continue moving). Observation would just be something that occurred after the experiment was over. It didn't influence the outcome. A wave would never reach something able to change its state ..unless there were two instances of state changes in its path (which-way eraser).

I found a new quantum trick the unobservable is able to achieve. While a new wave formulates, it is able to know if its state will change during its journey ..before it even starts to move. The unobservable is all time, all the time for a physicality variables. Unobserved quantum waves not having spacetime is a very big deal. Without time from spacetime, its life is instantaneous. The delayed choice quantum eraser demonstrates this. The only way the first entangled particle knows if the partner will ever be observed is if the state is known for the life of both entangled particles.

Is quantum which-way information the real cause?
Which-way has nothing to do with it. The final panel is wave collapse and doesn't effect the outcome like a state change does.
I figured out what is happening in an experiment that is "erasing" the "which-way" (with a polarizer). A Double slit with opposite polarizers ..and then an extra polarizer down the line acting as a "eraser";
State (physicality) of a particle is decided while it's being created. State changes are detected preemptively. When two detectors are in its path, its state would be changing twice. In this case, the particle is sent as an unobserved wave. What we are witnessing is what happens when a quantum wave actually goes through double slits and do not interact with polarizers. Proving that a polarizer only effects physical photon light because a single state change would have sent a physical photon at the double slits to go through a single slit.

I asked the forbidden question in physics and found a bridge to reality.
or should I say it's a bridge to the simulation? Spacetime may be an analog simulation built on the quantum field. It doesn't make any sense for light to have a speed limit. Spacetime must have a frame rate. If Spacetime is a simulation, State is the object being added to the program. Perhaps the frame rate is based off the speed something can be observed. Somewhere around 0.3 μm (micrometers) naturally gives a object a physical state. This is the distance light can travel in a femtosecond. This would mean spacetime has a frame rate of 1,000,000,000,000,000 frames per second. Don't bring up Planck, it isn't the size that determines if something is automatically physical.

The Higgs Field is nothing special. It's just another field in the Quantum Field that interacts with Spacetime when the object needs to be physical.

Black holes spaghettify matter and turn its physicality state off. Dark matter is matter that doesn't have the ability to have a physical state.
Black holes are not deleting information, it's just making it unobservable. The holographic principle sounded like a long shot anyways.
scifimath is offline  
Old Sep 23rd 2019, 02:08 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 474
topsquark likes this.
benit13 is offline  
Old Sep 23rd 2019, 09:58 AM   #3
Forum Admin
 
topsquark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: On the dance floor, baby!
Posts: 2,856
Originally Posted by scifimath View Post
Observation doesn't always mean Quantum Observation.
Properly addressing the misconceptions here would probably fill a book. I'll stick with this comment for now.

What is the difference between quantum observation and observation?

-Dan
__________________
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

See the forum rules here.
topsquark is online now  
Old Sep 23rd 2019, 07:21 PM   #4
Junior Member
 
donglebox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: CN GX WZ
Posts: 20
I'm also learning to write novels.

For reference only

Combining the reviewing experience of some science fiction editors

Good writers don't usually come up with all their ideas at once.

They will slowly unfold a profound idea in the book.

Instead of using it all at once.
donglebox is offline  
Closed Thread

  Physics Help Forum > Physics Forums > Physics

Tags
physicality, quantum, spacetime, state, waves



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Physics Forum Discussions
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Library of Babel quantum state Juanchotutata Quantum Physics 0 May 6th 2018 08:49 AM
Unobserved, Free particles in the state of superposition is proof of a 4th dimension pittsburghjoe Philosophy of Physics 11 Aug 2nd 2017 06:31 PM
Intensity of a wave in electromagnetism compared to quantum mechanical waves fergal Quantum Physics 1 Jan 17th 2017 08:28 AM
Quantum probability waves through single slit. kiwiheretic Quantum Physics 11 Jul 6th 2015 06:12 PM
Doppler phenomenon for electromagnetic waves and new equations for relativity quantum saman_1810 Quantum Physics 0 Jul 13th 2009 03:58 AM


Facebook Twitter Google+ RSS Feed