Physics Help Forum FRESNEL DIFFRACTION DERIVATION THAT est. the wave theory of light

 Physics Physics Forum - General Physics Discussion and Physics News

 May 1st 2018, 02:51 PM #1 Banned   Join Date: Apr 2018 Posts: 92 FRESNEL DIFFRACTION DERIVATION THAT est. the wave theory of light Fresnel derives a diffraction intensity equation by summating the interfering light waves' amplitudes, at the diffraction screen, using a line integral (equ 1). "Hence the intensity of the vibration at P resulting from all these small disturbances is { [ ʃ dz cos (π z2 (a + b) / abλ) ]2 + [ ʃ dz sin (π z2 (a + b) / abλ)]2 }1/2 "..................................1 (Fresnel, 53). Fresnel's derivation of the diffraction intensity equation uses a length integral where dz represents a segment of the wave AMI. Fresnel uses the length integral to summate the interfering light waves' amplitudes at the diffraction screen point P (fig 7) but the point P is not within the limits of Fresnel's length integral (equ 1). Also, the crests and nodes of Fresnel's light waves propagate in the forward direction. At the diffraction screen, the propagating light waves' amplitudes would result in the spherical waves' amplitudes to oscillate forming an average resultant amplitude of zero that would eliminate the diffraction pattern. Fresnel is using spherical waves formed along the wave AMI to derive the diffraction intensity equation. The interfering spherical waves' amplitudes are dependent on the inverse of the distance that intensity formed by the spherical waves is dependent on I = (U)2 where U is the equation of the spherical waves U = A cos(kr)/r. Using the distance r1 = .1 mm where the spherical waves are formed near the wave AMI, and, the distance of r2 = 5 cm that represents the distance from the wave AMI to the diffraction screen. The average total light intensity formed by the spherical waves just after leaving the wave AMI is I = [A cos(kr)/r]2 = B/(.0001)2 = B(108), and the average total intensity at the diffraction screen is I = [A cos(kr)/r]2 = B/(.05)2 = B(2.5 x 104). The total light intensity just after leaving the wave AMI decreases by the factor of 4,000, at the diffraction screen, using Fresnel's spherical wave diffraction mechanism. Using an analogy, the formation of the small rectangular aperture diffraction pattern (fig 8) is represented using wave interference but the destructive interference of the light waves' amplitudes (energy) used to form the dark fringes of the diffraction pattern represents the destruction of light intensity that would result in a reduction in the total light intensity of the diffraction pattern since the destroyed light waves' amplitudes do not contribute to the total light intensity of the diffraction pattern. Every point of the diffraction pattern is formed by the same number of interfering of light waves. More than 80% of the small rectangular aperture diffraction pattern is composed of dark areas which would result in more than a 60% reduction in the total light intensity of the diffraction pattern yet experimentally, the total light intensity that enters a small rectangular aperture (dt = 1s) is equal to the total light intensity of the diffraction pattern. Does everyone understand the difficulties regarding the wave theory of light if the foundation derivation is flawed?
 May 1st 2018, 08:22 PM #2 Forum Admin     Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: On the dance floor, baby! Posts: 2,491 Don't you ever Google things? This link will be helpful. See here. -Dan __________________ Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup. See the forum rules here.
 May 6th 2018, 12:07 PM #3 Banned   Join Date: Apr 2018 Posts: 92 Can you use your own physicist words to explain some of the numerous points the post describes. Such as, how the integration is applied and the wave oscillation problem or maybe the intensity problem.
May 6th 2018, 12:30 PM   #4

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: On the dance floor, baby!
Posts: 2,491
 Originally Posted by lovebunny Can you use your own physicist words to explain some of the numerous points the post describes. Such as, how the integration is applied and the wave oscillation problem or maybe the intensity problem.
The way you seem to ask questions only to ignore the answers you get is a flaw in all of your posts.

Fresnel diffraction is not all that hard. Look it up.

-Dan
__________________
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

See the forum rules here.

 Tags derivation, diffraction, est, fresnel, light, theory, wave

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Similar Physics Forum Discussions Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post oem7110 Light and Optics 2 Aug 27th 2014 09:59 AM fobos3 Advanced Mechanics 1 Feb 7th 2014 12:13 PM bhav007 Light and Optics 0 Apr 22nd 2013 03:10 PM HelenaStage Light and Optics 0 Nov 1st 2011 03:28 PM Devlan General Physics 1 Sep 18th 2011 08:44 PM