Go Back   Physics Help Forum > Physics Forums > Physics

Physics Physics Forum - General Physics Discussion and Physics News

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By topsquark
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 1st 2018, 02:51 PM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 92
FRESNEL DIFFRACTION DERIVATION THAT est. the wave theory of light

Fresnel derives a diffraction intensity equation by summating the interfering light waves' amplitudes, at the diffraction screen, using a line integral (equ 1).


"Hence the intensity of the vibration at P resulting from all these small disturbances is





{ [ ʃ dz cos (π z2 (a + b) / abλ) ]2 + [ ʃ dz sin (π z2 (a + b) / abλ)]2 }1/2 "..................................1





(Fresnel, 53). Fresnel's derivation of the diffraction intensity equation uses a length integral where dz represents a segment of the wave AMI. Fresnel uses the length integral to summate the interfering light waves' amplitudes at the diffraction screen point P (fig 7) but the point P is not within the limits of Fresnel's length integral (equ 1). Also, the crests and nodes of Fresnel's light waves propagate in the forward direction. At the diffraction screen, the propagating light waves' amplitudes would result in the spherical waves' amplitudes to oscillate forming an average resultant amplitude of zero that would eliminate the diffraction pattern.

Fresnel is using spherical waves formed along the wave AMI to derive the diffraction intensity equation. The interfering spherical waves' amplitudes are dependent on the inverse of the distance that intensity formed by the spherical waves is dependent on I = (U)2 where U is the equation of the spherical waves U = A cos(kr)/r. Using the distance r1 = .1 mm where the spherical waves are formed near the wave AMI, and, the distance of r2 = 5 cm that represents the distance from the wave AMI to the diffraction screen. The average total light intensity formed by the spherical waves just after leaving the wave AMI is I = [A cos(kr)/r]2 = B/(.0001)2 = B(108), and the average total intensity at the diffraction screen is I = [A cos(kr)/r]2 = B/(.05)2 = B(2.5 x 104). The total light intensity just after leaving the wave AMI decreases by the factor of 4,000, at the diffraction screen, using Fresnel's spherical wave diffraction mechanism.

Using an analogy, the formation of the small rectangular aperture diffraction pattern (fig 8) is represented using wave interference but the destructive interference of the light waves' amplitudes (energy) used to form the dark fringes of the diffraction pattern represents the destruction of light intensity that would result in a reduction in the total light intensity of the diffraction pattern since the destroyed light waves' amplitudes do not contribute to the total light intensity of the diffraction pattern. Every point of the diffraction pattern is formed by the same number of interfering of light waves. More than 80% of the small rectangular aperture diffraction pattern is composed of dark areas which would result in more than a 60% reduction in the total light intensity of the diffraction pattern yet experimentally, the total light intensity that enters a small rectangular aperture (dt = 1s) is equal to the total light intensity of the diffraction pattern.


Does everyone understand the difficulties regarding the wave theory of light if the foundation derivation is flawed?
lovebunny is offline  
Old May 1st 2018, 08:22 PM   #2
Forum Admin
 
topsquark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: On the dance floor, baby!
Posts: 2,466
Don't you ever Google things?

This link will be helpful. See here.

-Dan
__________________
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

See the forum rules here.
topsquark is offline  
Old May 6th 2018, 12:07 PM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 92
Can you use your own physicist words to explain some of the numerous points the post describes. Such as, how the integration is applied and the wave oscillation problem or maybe the intensity problem.
lovebunny is offline  
Old May 6th 2018, 12:30 PM   #4
Forum Admin
 
topsquark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: On the dance floor, baby!
Posts: 2,466
Originally Posted by lovebunny View Post
Can you use your own physicist words to explain some of the numerous points the post describes. Such as, how the integration is applied and the wave oscillation problem or maybe the intensity problem.
The way you seem to ask questions only to ignore the answers you get is a flaw in all of your posts.

Fresnel diffraction is not all that hard. Look it up.

Thread closed.

-Dan
studiot likes this.
__________________
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

See the forum rules here.
topsquark is offline  
Closed Thread

  Physics Help Forum > Physics Forums > Physics

Tags
derivation, diffraction, est, fresnel, light, theory, wave



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Physics Forum Discussions
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How does Sunglass block UV light wave? oem7110 Light and Optics 2 Aug 27th 2014 09:59 AM
Vibrating String in 2D Wave Equation Derivation fobos3 Advanced Mechanics 1 Feb 7th 2014 12:13 PM
capturing diffraction images of light through pinholes bhav007 Light and Optics 0 Apr 22nd 2013 03:10 PM
Fresnel Biprism HelenaStage Light and Optics 0 Nov 1st 2011 03:28 PM
Fresnel in OH? Devlan General Physics 1 Sep 18th 2011 08:44 PM


Facebook Twitter Google+ RSS Feed