Go Back   Physics Help Forum > Physics Forums > Philosophy of Physics

Philosophy of Physics Philosophy of Physics Forum - Philosophical questions about our universe

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jul 26th 2019, 07:19 PM   #21
Forum Admin
 
topsquark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: On the dance floor, baby!
Posts: 2,778
Originally Posted by neila9876 View Post
Resort to the authentic theory/textbook, I can't find a way to explain why the neutral liquid iron core is able to generate magnetism. What a joke that people have gone to explore cosmos before they make clear why magnetic poles flipped on earth.haha...
Metals have a large number of "free" electrons from the valence shells of the metallic bonds. So a spinning metal will generate a small electric field without having any kind of special circumstance such as an "electron skin" on it's surface. (There's probably a small one there... free charges tend to migrate on the surface of a conductor, but only if there is an excess charge in the metal.

Originally Posted by neila9876 View Post
resort to your method, I found that electron has physical structure and I calculated its size and mass density.
You never explain yourself when you make these kinds of comments. As currently theory stands electrons are "point particles." i.e. they have no size and thus have no internal structure.

Now, everyone admits that this is at best an idealization but no one has ever been able to find either a size or internal structure. Please let us know how you came to this conclusion.

-Dan
__________________
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

See the forum rules here.
topsquark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 26th 2019, 07:40 PM   #22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: cosmos
Posts: 495
Talking rabbits

@rabbit htam9876:
Next, the semi tramp did not go to cosmos for fashion. He went to the nearest star, the Sun. He used the same method explain the solar magnetism and the black spot magnetism. He estimate that the magnetic pole of black spots in northen semi-sphere and in southen semi-sphere flips. The magnetic pole of black spots in solar max and in solar min will flip. If astronomical observation see that strange phenominia?
That dragon is real a wavicle of both bad guy and physist. He always like to turn bunnies on their back intentionally to see they kick for fun. Perhaps he likes to use this kind of artificial method to research anti matter.haha...
Attached Thumbnails
Tramp and Electron-265899.jpg  
neila9876 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 27th 2019, 04:06 PM   #23
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: cosmos
Posts: 495
Talking rabbits

@rabbit htam9876:
I heared one philosophist Woody from England said:
"If you want to be pedantic (which perhaps we should be)
Quarks are theoretical entities, that we cannot observe.
However they allow a mathematically consistent picture to be defined that properly models the peculiarities of the particles we can observe.

The success of this model (in matching the observed behaviours) has lead physicists to accept that it is (probably) correct. "
....................
My comment is that:
1. Any theory is limited ability.
2. You are (probably) correct too.
This semi-tramp resort to your method and established another neutron model and explained why neutron star generates extreme strong magnetism, why neutron star can emit X ray and even why neutron must take part in nuclei except Hydrogen, etc, in a sum. It's the duck model.haha...
Attached Thumbnails
Tramp and Electron-htam98760.jpg  

Last edited by neila9876; Jul 27th 2019 at 05:07 PM. Reason: correct word
neila9876 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28th 2019, 08:38 AM   #24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: cosmos
Posts: 495
Talking hen vs duck

@rabbit htam9876:
I talk about experiment this time. The Beta decay of free neutron.
It's a bit funny that that dragon's hen (neutron) emits a duck egg (electron) rather than a chicken egg (quark).
In the duck model, it's easy to explain why. Because the hen in fact is a duck.
Oh,no...
Attached Thumbnails
Tramp and Electron-22211119876.jpg  
neila9876 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28th 2019, 12:35 PM   #25
Forum Admin
 
topsquark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: On the dance floor, baby!
Posts: 2,778
Originally Posted by neila9876 View Post
@rabbit htam9876:
I talk about experiment this time. The Beta decay of free neutron.
It's a bit funny that that dragon's hen (neutron) emits a duck egg (electron) rather than a chicken egg (quark).
In the duck model, it's easy to explain why. Because the hen in fact is a duck.
Oh,no...
The decay of a neutron into a proton and an electron (you also have to have an electron anti-neutrino) is, by definition: $\displaystyle n^0 \rightarrow p^+ + e^- + \overline{\nu} ^0$. In terms of quarks (which is what is really going on) $\displaystyle d^{-1/3} \rightarrow u^{+2/3} + e^- + \overline{ \nu } ^0$.

Anything else is not, by definition, beta decay.

-Dan
__________________
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

See the forum rules here.
topsquark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28th 2019, 04:14 PM   #26
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: cosmos
Posts: 495
Talking rabbits

@rabbit htam9876:
The American astronomor Rubin predicted that "dark matter" exists in cosmos although that dragon does not love in it.
In the duck model, calculation demonstrates that "4D space similar matters" must exist in cosmos. If you refer them to the "dark matter", I will not say "objection". You see me dark and me see you dark.haha...
Attached Thumbnails
Tramp and Electron-u-383275.jpg  
neila9876 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28th 2019, 10:32 PM   #27
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: cosmos
Posts: 495
Talking

Think about what this philosophist from England is talking:
"Accelerating electrons emit radiation.
Electrons in atoms are not emitting radiation, so they are not accelerating.
So the simple electron orbital model can not be correct.

More recent Quantum Mechanics based models avoid these problems. "
_________________
~\o/~
Comment from this semi tramp:
Although his representation is not so explicit, but his is talking something unusual in respect of electromagnetic.
Someone must appear and talk about vector, this and that, and ****? So simple?haha...
neila9876 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 29th 2019, 04:44 PM   #28
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: cosmos
Posts: 495
Talking wavicle

@rabbit htam9876:
I appreciate one of your words very much:"If the electron in atom has only wave character, can we see this regular word?"
No...
I learned the English word "wavicle" from that dragon.
This semi-tramp resort to your method, the duck model reflects any microscopic particle has wave-particle duality. It's determined by physical substance of them. Real cosmos has two aspects: certain and uncertain.
4D space current concept demonstrates that when an electron turns around the nucleus in round orbit, the 4D space current does not change.haha...
Attached Thumbnails
Tramp and Electron-1000230.jpg  
neila9876 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 29th 2019, 07:56 PM   #29
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: cosmos
Posts: 495
Talking v

@rabbit htam9876:
That dragon asked a question elsewhere: "...Can you please explain what you meant?"
In 4D space, velocity v can trend to infinite too. Cosmos does not mistreat speed. that's sommething we can't see. I remember that you mentioned this too once upon a time. But I think you just had a primary concept of the state dimension at that time. Now this semi-tramp have defined the 4D physical space and turned your mathod/concept into a primary "theory".haha...I use true 4D math to represent the concept and it becomes more explicit and easy to uunderstand.
When I see your origional representation, I can laugh my butt off.haha...
Attached Thumbnails
Tramp and Electron-timgjfti0wqv.jpg  

Last edited by neila9876; Jul 29th 2019 at 08:03 PM.
neila9876 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 29th 2019, 08:32 PM   #30
Forum Admin
 
topsquark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: On the dance floor, baby!
Posts: 2,778
Originally Posted by neila9876 View Post
@rabbit htam9876:
That dragon asked a question elsewhere: "...Can you please explain what you meant?"
In 4D space, velocity v can trend to infinite too. Cosmos does not mistreat speed. that's sommething we can't see. I remember that you mentioned this too once upon a time. But I think you just had a primary concept of the state dimension at that time. Now this semi-tramp have defined the 4D physical space and turned your mathod/concept into a primary "theory".haha...I use true 4D math to represent the concept and it becomes more explicit and easy to uunderstand.
When I see your origional representation, I can laugh my butt off.haha...
I would like you to expand on this. You've mentioned the 4D universe a number of times but haven't explained it. I'm curious to see what you mean by it.

-Dan
__________________
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

See the forum rules here.
topsquark is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  Physics Help Forum > Physics Forums > Philosophy of Physics

Tags
electron, tramp



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Physics Forum Discussions
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Electron transitions Clyner82 Atomic and Solid State Physics 1 Mar 13th 2016 01:15 PM
Electron orbit kiwiheretic Nuclear and Particle Physics 15 Jul 1st 2014 03:30 PM
Why Positron + Electron? DKseed Advanced Electricity and Magnetism 1 Jun 15th 2011 09:28 AM
Electron werehk Electricity and Magnetism 3 Jul 16th 2008 05:27 AM
Electron Velocity Aryth Special and General Relativity 6 Apr 17th 2008 05:03 AM


Facebook Twitter Google+ RSS Feed