Go Back   Physics Help Forum > Physics Forums > Philosophy of Physics

Philosophy of Physics Philosophy of Physics Forum - Philosophical questions about our universe

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jan 16th 2017, 05:35 PM   #1
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 58
English grammar track on time

English grammar is physics as we take study and test as counting on logics(Academy). So we can talk each other by language that is physics. Talking means just like forever as logical frame and in the same way for one man's life. It is the track for one way, forever. Each word is fit to time absolutely.
philipishin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17th 2017, 06:24 AM   #2
Senior Member
Woody's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: England
Posts: 666
Absolutely Not.

Physics and English Grammar cannot be equated.

The lack of clear and consistent rules in English grammar was something I personally found very difficult during my school years.
It was one of the attractions (for me) of Maths and Physics that they did have (relatively) fixed and consistent rules and results.

I believe that some other languages do have a much more structured syntax and grammar, particularly those that are not in general usage (e.g. Latin, Esperanto).
But English is a totally mongrel language, picking up inconsistent bits and pieces from a wide range of parent languages.
English is also constantly changing and evolving, as people continually make mistakes in every-day usage which gradually become the accepted norm.

This makes English perhaps uniquely inconsistent, but also (arguably) uniquely expressive.
Woody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 1st 2017, 08:56 AM   #3
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 9
There are very strict rules of grammar that are abused by literate and illiterate with equal enthusiasm.

Nonetheless there are emphatic rules with a sharp cutting edge, the purpose of which is first to facilitate logical thought and second to enable accurate communication.

Demonstration of poor grammar is evidence of the lack of one, the other, or both. In a similar way humanity abuses physics with declarative statements like, "Hey guys, watch this!"

While words are spoken or conveyed, physics is not a verb.
We do not say, "to physic" in the same way as "to speak."
So there is no comparison except to note distinction.

There is no past and no future, so words/thoughts are not locked in time.
It is rather the symbols of them that survive in the present.

There is no such thing as a timeline.
It is a concept that only benefits an observer.

(Just my physics ignorant opinion)
simracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 1st 2017, 11:25 AM   #4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 405
Physics and English

Good topic here. Years past I wrote this as a first page of discussion.
Very difficult writing for me. Just a first try.

1.00 Matter Exists in Space and Time | THERMO Spoken Here!

THERMO Spoken Here is offline   Reply With Quote

  Physics Help Forum > Physics Forums > Philosophy of Physics

english, grammar, time, track

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Physics Forum Discussions
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2D projectile motion - Am I on the right track? Splint Kinematics and Dynamics 1 Mar 25th 2011 10:31 PM
work and the ideal gas law- am i on the right track b0mb3rz Energy and Work 1 Oct 17th 2009 03:29 AM
Banked track werehk Kinematics and Dynamics 18 Aug 11th 2009 11:03 PM
Inclined race track Lukapaka Kinematics and Dynamics 1 Mar 3rd 2009 07:48 PM
cart on a track devanlevin Kinematics and Dynamics 2 Nov 20th 2008 06:27 AM

Facebook Twitter Google+ RSS Feed