Physics Help Forum e = t

 Philosophy of Physics Philosophy of Physics Forum - Philosophical questions about our universe

 Jan 2nd 2017, 04:17 PM #1 Member     Join Date: Nov 2016 Posts: 43 e = t Energy is a dimension just as much as Time. In this dimension everything travels as energy in waveform. The entire EM Spectrum is a subset to this dimension (until it is measured). All quantum weirdness events takes place in this dimension (superposition). The double slit experiment finally makes sense. The particle is an energy wave until it is measured and becomes mass. Dimensions of Mass = xyz ​Dimension of Energy = quantum waves Dimension of Time = t
 Jan 3rd 2017, 06:14 AM #2 Senior Member   Join Date: Aug 2010 Posts: 281 What do you mean by "dimension". It is clear that you are not using the usual meaning. For one thing "the entire EM spectrum" is not a subset of any "dimension"! An wave (not an "energy" wave) becomes a particle after it is measured, not a "mass"- mass is a particular property of matter, not a physical object itself. I strongly suggest you look up the actual definitions of "dimension" and "mass" before you go on. No, "xyz" (I assume you mean three axes in space) have nothing to do with mass. topsquark likes this.
 Jan 3rd 2017, 06:15 AM #3 Senior Member     Join Date: Jun 2016 Location: England Posts: 377 Hi PittsburghJoe, I'm not sure that I understand your post, however you might like to consider the vector. Note how mass appears in the space-wise components and Energy in the time-wise component. Last edited by Woody; Jan 3rd 2017 at 06:20 AM.
Jan 3rd 2017, 01:40 PM   #4
Member

Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 43
 Originally Posted by HallsofIvy What do you mean by "dimension". It is clear that you are not using the usual meaning. For one thing "the entire EM spectrum" is not a subset of any "dimension"!
How would you describe what I'm talking about without using the word "Dimension"? Maybe "realm" or "layer to our universe"? I'm basically saying that we live in a world of three major channels: Mass, Energy, and Time. EM waves are part of this dimension, that's what this thread is about. Time to rewrite the textbooks!

 Originally Posted by HallsofIvy An wave (not an "energy" wave) becomes a particle after it is measured, not a "mass"- mass is a particular property of matter, not a physical object itself.
I'm sticking to my new way of describing "mass".

Jan 3rd 2017, 01:42 PM   #5
Member

Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 43
 Originally Posted by Woody Hi PittsburghJoe, I'm not sure that I understand your post, however you might like to consider the vector. Note how mass appears in the space-wise components and Energy in the time-wise component.
Interesting, as soon as I can wrap my head around it, I might be able to work it into my theory. thanks

Jan 4th 2017, 07:47 AM   #6
Senior Member

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 281
 Originally Posted by pittsburghjoe How would you describe what I'm talking about without using the word "Dimension"? Maybe "realm" or "layer to our universe"? I'm basically saying that we live in a world of three major channels: Mass, Energy, and Time. EM waves are part of this dimension, that's what this thread is about. Time to rewrite the textbooks! I'm sticking to my new way of describing "mass".
So you don't want anyone to understand you anyway.

 Jan 4th 2017, 12:27 PM #7 Member     Join Date: Nov 2016 Posts: 43 I treat mass the same way as a 3D modeling program. A measured neutrino or electron has a single set of x,y,z (a vertex). Anything bigger being brought over from Energy Dimension will have depth (more x,y,z's assigned to the object).
 Jan 5th 2017, 04:59 AM #8 Senior Member     Join Date: Jun 2016 Location: England Posts: 377 In physics the term "dimension" is generally reserved for the four components of the vectors defining relative positions in spacetime. (In string theory they add extra "dimensions", but that is another story). The scalar quantities detailing the properties of an object (e.g mass & energy) are not generally referred to in terms of "dimension". While the magnitude of these scalar properties could be represented along an additional axis of a graph (i.e. along an extra dimension), this terminology would not (in general) be used. topsquark likes this.
 Jan 5th 2017, 03:02 PM #9 Member     Join Date: Nov 2016 Posts: 43 Do I dare call this Energy layer a Force?
Jan 9th 2017, 07:56 AM   #10

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: On the dance floor, baby!
Posts: 2,169
 Originally Posted by pittsburghjoe Do I dare call this Energy layer a Force?
Nope. Energy is not a force and can't be labeled as such. Listen to what Halls and Woody are saying...they are correct. In order for you to progress here you need to stop talking about "dimensions" and "xyz." These are terms that have specific, and widely accepted, definitions. In order to talk comprehensively you need to attach new and descriptive variable names to your concepts. Else you are talking gibberish.

-Dan
__________________
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

See the forum rules here.

 Tags dimension, energy, quantum

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode