- **Nuclear and Particle Physics**
(*http://physicshelpforum.com/nuclear-particle-physics/*)

- - **World without satanism: photon, electron , neutron , proton**
(*http://physicshelpforum.com/nuclear-particle-physics/8368-world-without-satanism-photon-electron-neutron-proton.html*)

World without satanism: photon, electron , neutron , protonHi Guys . See my knockout results. "World without satanism: photon, electron , neutron , proton". second version Figures you can see in my site newcanadianvideo.com Photon is an electromagnetic wave, it is twisted into a ring at any oblique collision with material ( Figure 1). If you are driving on ice and rapidly press on the brake, the car starts spinning around its center of mass . This is the same. Wave twists with respect to its center. Where its center ? Its λ / 2 , of course. The wave carries an energy. If the positive half period , mixed with the negative half period , the energy of the wave has to disappear. This should not be . Hence the negative charge , and a positive should be as far as possible apart during this "mixing" . In this "ring" geometry is the only possibility( Fig. 1) Negative charge (blue edge of the ring ) and a positive charge (yellow edge of the ring ) are on the maximum distance from each other . At a photon appears momentum about the center of the wave, and an energy and behaves as already a "mass" . " Moreover, due to the symmetry of the photon picture should appear two masses , and the negative charge "weight" has equal to the weight the positive charge "weight". Agree ? Therefore, the photon burst centrifugal forces ( Fig 4). This is the electron and positron , and not a photon. They flee away. How to find their mass? This well-known formula , m = h/2C λ, ( 1) where λ - the Compton wavelength of the electron . You can find it anywhere , but without the " 2" in the denominator. "2" appears on the fact that the energy splits between an electron and a positron. Real Compton wave length is 2 times less than that measured because 95 % of the results in particle physics is manipulation of results. So the high energy photon before the decay looks like a wide torus . Photon with energy less then 1 MeV can't decay . Electron (Fig. 2) Electron and positron have views of the torus. Large radius R = λ/2π ~ 2 * 10 to minus 13 degrees , (λ calculated by the formula (1)) . Minor torus radius , r, is the classical electron radius r = 2.5 * 10 to minus 15 degrees. Torus continues to revolve around the same center of symmetry , because it gave him a mass and has a spin . L = p * R / 2 = h * R / 2 * λ = h2π / 2 * 2 * π = ħ / 2 where p- photon momentum . Is known reverse process - electron and positron annihilation, which forms 2-3 photons . You say that in my logic is not possible backlash . Before annihilation the electron and positron have to pick somewhere neutrinos and antineutrinos , and it is not possible . And here is the main intrigue begins. Wave is at rest with respect to itself, So between the positron and the electron , there is only the electrostatic interaction . Why not positron and an electron can annihilate directly into wide torus , because they have different charges , which must attract each other. ? Because of the same reason: photon energy disappears. So between the positron and the electron must be layer that does not allow them to get closer . What energy in this interlayer ? It is the maximum energy of the electrostatic field when the electron and positron are almost touching each other . E = e * e/2r * εo * 8 * π Calculation gives ~ 2 MeV. It is a pure quantum of field . It has neither mass nor charge . Only in this case, swapping the electron and positron , symmetry is not breaking . Due to the same symmetry it should consist of two halves of 1 MeV. - Positron and electron neutrinos, which , of course, differ from each other because of electron and positron are different . Electron and positron carry 1 MeV energy ( the sum of the kinetic and rest energy ) . Yes, you have understood correctly, Bro . Relativistic mass increase - this is nonsense , there are direct Chinese experiments [1]. The world does not consist of 100 % of crooks . But in this consideration the maximum possible photon energy should not exceed 2 MeV. The fact that there is a toroidal longitudinal wave frequency ,w, and transverse wave frequency W ( Figure 3). Find the frequency W . The maximum W value is W = w * R / r, naturally. Now I calculated its contribution to the electron energy E = L * I * I / 2 , where L is the inductance , I amperage due to the circular motion of the charge. Current along the great circle of the torus , I = e * C / 2 πR, and along small - . I = e * C / 2 πr. "Width " of coil wire is r and length of coil is 2πR , of cause. E = μo * 4 * π * πR * eeCC / 2 * 4π * π * r * r = μo * R * e * e * C * C / 2 * r * r ( 2) This is ~ 500 MeV for an electron / positron pair . This is the maximum possible energy that can carry a photon ( a positron and an electron ) . The collapse of a photon with energy 100 - 1000 MeV (Fig. 4). First off a positron. It's very funny . Why is it funny? Because the end of the reaction is called the muon decay . And taking off the first positron, they do not want to see. 95% results in particle physics is manipulation of results. Neutron Now lets see two " slow down" photon with high energy, which have not yet decayed . Between them there are , naturally , electrostatic bond, but these bonds are weak, they do not prevent decay can (Fig 5). The first electron is emitted from the neutron ( Figure 6) , opening the bottle . Then electron neutrinos emitted , taking the fourth part of the mass of the neutron, if we stick to the official version of the neutron decay . But the further disintegration is not possible : there is an electromagnetic field , the energy field is not taken out of nowhere. Neutrinos gives its energy to the electromagnetic field . proton Proton is a torus positron coupled with the torus photon as engagement rings . At a photon , of course, the width is equal to twice the width of the classical electron radius . If we stick to the official version of the neutron decay , I have 250Mev shortage . But most likely, all two neutrinos remain. 95% results in particle physics is manipulation of results. See my third edition. The last picture , I certainly will alter . are asking how such a large electron (positron ) can fit in such a small proton ? The same way as shown in Fig. 6. Positron Lockers in a proton 1000 MeV of energy, like sparkling water in bottle. The proton mass is not real . The only electron and positron have mass . First, this mass was also not real, but due to " run in circles photon " , it became real . Another value of the mass of an electron could not be, because the electron charge is always the same . Electron mass so indivisible. This quantum of mass . Of all stored in the photon energy into mass can turn only 1 MeV , almost everything else takes away the neutrino . Well, you know , Bro , that in this universe there is only light , electromagnetism and gravity. Everything. else - it's fudge . No weak and strong interaction does not exist in nature. If you look closely at the history of the opening of bosons W, Z, then you realize that it was a scam , similar to Higgs boson discovery . First was the discovery on paper, and then the proof has been taken from low probability background reactions .... P.S. To have been twisted scenario so famously ,One must be highly qualified . It is absolutely clear that in that moment , has two Ph. D. degree at least : first in physical chemistry , which does not accept compromises , and the second in classical physics. Third version is coming [1 ] Liangzao Fan. Three experiments challenging Einstein's relativistic mechanics and traditional electromagnetic acceleration theory Mykhaylo Lomidze Ph. D in Physical Chemistry. |

Please refrain from religious references in the Physics. -Dan |

I don't understand? Your argument is that strong and weak nuclear forces are a scam and yet you mentioned only W and Z bosons? Gluons mediate the strong nuclear interaction and W and Z bosons have been observed and studied for decades in various laboratories across the globe. |

Quote:
That said, here's what's wrong with your "knockout results" Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I'll stop here since the rest appears to be just as wrong and misguided as what's above. |

Whilst Physforum has been discontinued, your archived post there from 2013 is readily obtainable. What makes you think the same nonsense posted here will fair any better, 4 years on? |

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:47 PM. |

Copyright © 2016 Physics Help Forum. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2008-2012 Physics Help Forum. All rights reserved.