Go Back   Physics Help Forum > College/University Physics Help > Nuclear and Particle Physics

Nuclear and Particle Physics Nuclear and Particle Physics Help Forum

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Lagreeni
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 1st 2018, 03:30 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 2
Question Electrostatic Coulomb Constant

Hi,

I'm sorry if this ends up being a duplicate, but I don't think the post I submited yesterday actually went through.

I'm having an insane amount of difficulty figuring out how the electrostatic coulomb constant:

a<coul>=3/5*ke^2/r<0>

can equal around 0.8MeV.

With the constants:
k=9E9 [Nm^2/c^2]
e=1.6E-19 [c^2]
r<0>=1.07E-15 [m]

I don't get a number anywhere near 0.8MeV. I don't understand what is going on. I do get a value for a<coul>, 0.807MeV, IF I don't square the electric charge term. I don't get why this is happening. Can someone please help?
Lagreeni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 2nd 2018, 08:20 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Somerset, England
Posts: 995
Originally Posted by Lagreeni View Post
Hi,



I don't get a number anywhere near 0.8MeV.
I'm not suprised.

0.8 MeV is a unit of energy.

The units in your expression work out as


$\displaystyle \frac{{N{m^2}}}{{{c^2}}}*\frac{{{{\left( {{c^2}} \right)}^2}}}{m}$

I don't know what these are, since the symbols are unconventional, but they are not units of energy.


Where did this come from?
studiot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 2nd 2018, 09:21 AM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 2
I actually figured it out yesterday and it was definitely a face palm mistake. So the units come out as Nm, which are joules (studiot, you accidentally squared coulombs twice). So I never converted the full thing to eV (which is 1.6E-19J=eV). That's why one of the electric charges becomes "obsolete". It's ridiculous how many hours I spent head scratching over this, but it ended up being a pretty trivial mistake.

Thank you for your response studiot, you pointed out exactly the right thing.
studiot likes this.
Lagreeni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 2nd 2018, 09:43 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Somerset, England
Posts: 995
Originally Posted by Lagreeni View Post
I actually figured it out yesterday and it was definitely a face palm mistake. So the units come out as Nm, which are joules (studiot, you accidentally squared coulombs twice). So I never converted the full thing to eV (which is 1.6E-19J=eV). That's why one of the electric charges becomes "obsolete". It's ridiculous how many hours I spent head scratching over this, but it ended up being a pretty trivial mistake.

Thank you for your response studiot, you pointed out exactly the right thing.

Firstly thanks for coming back with the end of the story.
Not many do that.

But there was nothing accidental about what I wrote.

Your formula said

e^2

and you also said

e= c^2

I know it is not easy to write formulae on this forum unless you know TEx or MathML but please try and use plenty of brackets in future.
It was not totally clear what your expressions actually meant.

But I've saved the best bit till last.

You actually figured it out for yourself, which is always the best way.

Well done

studiot is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  Physics Help Forum > College/University Physics Help > Nuclear and Particle Physics

Tags
binding, constant, coulomb, electrostatic, energy



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Physics Forum Discussions
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Coulomb's law Heidi Electricity and Magnetism 2 Apr 11th 2013 01:45 AM
electrostatic harimakenji Electricity and Magnetism 0 Aug 8th 2010 09:49 AM
Coulomb's Law Akshay Advanced Electricity and Magnetism 1 May 21st 2009 12:04 AM
Law of Coulomb Apprentice123 Advanced Electricity and Magnetism 6 Mar 23rd 2009 10:26 AM
Coulomb's Law sean_feely Advanced Electricity and Magnetism 2 Jun 18th 2008 10:55 AM


Facebook Twitter Google+ RSS Feed