Physics Help Forum Energy in a crash
 User Name Remember Me? Password

 Kinematics and Dynamics Kinematics and Dynamics Physics Help Forum

Mar 23rd 2018, 08:13 AM   #11
Physics Team

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boston's North Shore
Posts: 1,576
 Originally Posted by benit13 Negative energy is impossible.
Note: By this its benit13 means "Negative kinetic energy is impossible." Negative energy itself is very possible and always used in physic

I'm not 100% clear what TWq means by "energy of crash." The total energy before the collision is the sum of the kinetic energy of each car. The total energy after collision is the sum of sound energy and thermal energy, the sum of which equals the totals total energy before the collision.

 Mar 23rd 2018, 08:28 AM #12 Junior Member   Join Date: Mar 2018 Posts: 2 Thank you very much for your answers! It's really helpful and I like the discussion that's arisen. Making this a bit more complex: Imagine instead of the cars crashing, one car throws (throwing without extra force) a stone of 1 kg at the other car. The kinetic energy it gets from that car is 0,5*1*10^2 = 50. The kinetic energy the other car contributes is, according to the above, another 50. So the energy with which the stone hits the other car is 100. So the relative speed of the stone between the two cars is 20 m/s, but the energy with which it impacts is equal to only (100 = 0,5*1*v^2; v=) 14,14 m/s. Is that correct?
Mar 23rd 2018, 08:54 AM   #13
Senior Member

Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 444
 Originally Posted by Tqw Making this a bit more complex: Imagine instead of the cars crashing, one car throws (throwing without extra force) a stone of 1 kg at the other car. The kinetic energy it gets from that car is 0,5*1*10^2 = 50. The kinetic energy the other car contributes is, according to the above, another 50.
Why another 50? If a stone of mass 1 kg travelling at +10 m/s collides with a car of mass 1000 kg with a velocity of -10 m/s, the total kinetic energy of the collision is

$\displaystyle KE = KE_{stone} + KE_{car} = 50 + 50000 = 50050 J$

I don't think this number is very useful though.

 No the energy with which the stone hits the other car is 100. So the relative speed of the stone between the two cars is 20 m/s, but the energy with which it impacts is equal to only (100 = 0,5*1*v^2; v=) 14,14 m/s. Is that correct?
Nope.

If you're driving a car and someone throws the stone at your car, then in your reference frame, you will see a stone travelling towards you at 20 m/s. If, after the collision, the stone is inside your car, it is travelling now with you in your car, so the total energy exchanged is

$\displaystyle \Delta E = \frac{1}{2} \cdot 1 \cdot (20)^2 = 200 J.$

It is often easier and more enlightening in collision problems to consider momentum exchange. In this case you have a stone with momentum

$\displaystyle p_1 = mv_1 = 1 \cdot 10 = 10$ kg m/s

Colliding with a car. After the collision, the momentum of the stone is

$\displaystyle p_2 = mv_2 = 1 \cdot -10 = -10$ kg m/s

So the total momentum exchange, $\displaystyle \Delta p = p_1 - p_2$, from the stone to the car is 20 kg m/s. If this collision occurs over 0.01 seconds, then the force is

$\displaystyle F = \frac{\Delta p}{\Delta t} = \frac{20}{0.01} = 2000 N$

And the energy transferred from the stone to the car can also be calculated from the momentum exchange:

$\displaystyle \Delta E = \frac{\Delta p^2}{2m} = \frac{20^2}{2 \cdot 1} = 200 J$

Last edited by benit13; Mar 23rd 2018 at 09:40 AM.

Mar 23rd 2018, 08:55 AM   #14
Senior Member

Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 444
 Originally Posted by Pmb Note: By this its benit13 means "Negative kinetic energy is impossible." Negative energy itself is very possible and always used in physic
Sorry, yes, I meant kinetic energy.

 Tags crash, energy, kinetics

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Similar Physics Forum Discussions Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post avito009 Physics 5 Oct 23rd 2017 12:16 PM thinhnghiem Light and Optics 1 Aug 30th 2016 09:51 AM ling233 Nuclear and Particle Physics 3 Oct 20th 2014 03:27 PM fishkeeper Nuclear and Particle Physics 4 Mar 1st 2011 11:37 PM s3a Energy and Work 1 May 28th 2009 06:02 PM