Go Back   Physics Help Forum > High School and Pre-University Physics Help > Kinematics and Dynamics

Kinematics and Dynamics Kinematics and Dynamics Physics Help Forum

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Sep 9th 2017, 10:08 PM   #1
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 1
Computing Gravitational Potential Energy

I am taking a physics class for non-physics majors.

As water descends from the top of a tall hydroelectric dam, its gravitational potential energy is converted to electric energy. How much gravitational potential energy is released when 900 kg of water descends 220 m to the generators?

Going off the book,
Gravitational Potential Energy = (Mass)(Acceleration due to gravity)(height) or u = (m)(g)(h)

g = 9.8
m = 900
h = 220

(900)(9.8)(220) = 1,940,400 Joules or 1,940.4 kJ

It says this is incorrect. What am I missing?
cabal029 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 10th 2017, 12:50 AM   #2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 453
Your answer is correct ...or to be precise 1.9404MJ

Don't be surprised , text books , particularly in the US are full of errors and misleading and confusing questions ... it's planned to be that way by the people at the top , to keep people frustrated and stupid ..

See Charlotte Iserbyt 'The deliberate dumbing down of America"
oz93666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 10th 2017, 01:38 AM   #3
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Somerset, England
Posts: 1,009
Although Physics is not your major, you obviously have an interest.

Yes your calculation is correct as far as it goes, but if all the potential energy of the water was converted to electricity than there would be nothing to cause the water to flow onwards at the bottom.

You might like to look through this (short) thread to understand a little further.

Mass flow rate of water in a hydraulic turbine
studiot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 11th 2017, 07:29 AM   #4
Physics Team
ChipB's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Morristown, NJ USA
Posts: 2,333
Given that you've used a value for g that is good to only two digits of accuracy, the answer you gave is "over precise," meaning you have too many digits of accuracy for the data provided. In other words rather than 1940.4 kJ, see if the system accepts 1940 kJ instead.

If that doesn't work, try using a value of g=9.81 m/s^2 and see if the result is considered "right."

Last edited by ChipB; Sep 11th 2017 at 07:31 AM.
ChipB is offline   Reply With Quote

  Physics Help Forum > High School and Pre-University Physics Help > Kinematics and Dynamics

computing, energy, gravitational, potential

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Physics Forum Discussions
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gravitational potential energy goldsomecriss Physics 5 Aug 14th 2017 11:02 AM
Gravitational Potential Energy Clyner82 Energy and Work 3 May 16th 2016 01:03 PM
gravitational potential energy TGS Energy and Work 1 Nov 19th 2009 08:34 AM
Gravitational Potential Energy baytom Advanced Mechanics 5 Feb 22nd 2009 07:59 PM
Gravitational Potential Energy rocket_man Advanced Mechanics 2 Jun 4th 2008 06:50 AM

Facebook Twitter Google+ RSS Feed