Physics Help Forum How heavy is 1kg steel and 1kg wood

 Kinematics and Dynamics Kinematics and Dynamics Physics Help Forum

 Mar 1st 2015, 09:36 PM #1 Banned   Join Date: Feb 2015 Posts: 162 How heavy is 1kg steel and 1kg wood **************EM radiation Is Pushing objects *************** James Clerk Maxwell, in 1861–64, published his theory of electromagnetic fields and radiation, which shows that light has momentum and thus can exert pressure on objects. Maxwell's equations provide the theoretical foundation for sailing with light pressure. So by 1864, the physics community and beyond knew sunlight carried momentum that would exert a pressure on objects. Radiation pressure in classical electromagnetism: ... it was published by James Clerk Maxwell in 1862, and proven experimentally 1900-1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_sail http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiati...gnetism:_waves ********************************************* 1kg steel compare to 1 kg wood we speak about small and big m ****************************************** FAR FAR AWAY IN SPACE PErSON IS PUSHING big and small m his finger feel the same resistance !!! conclusion ( person is in space ZERO outside gravitation signals ) http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae305.cfm 1) Inertial mass. This is mainly defined by Newton's law, the all-too-famous F = ma, which states that when a force F is applied to an object, it will accelerate proportionally, and that constant of proportion is the mass of that object. In very concrete terms, to determine the inertial mass, you apply a force of F Newtons to an object, measure the acceleration in m/s2, and F/a will give you the inertial mass m in kilograms. 2) Gravitational mass. This is defined by the force of gravitation, which states that there is a gravitational force between any pair of objects, which is given by F = G m1 m2/r2 where G is the universal gravitational constant, m1 and m2 are the masses of the two objects, and r is the distance between them. This, in effect defines the gravitational mass of an object. As it turns out, these two masses are equal to each other as far as we can measure. Also, the equivalence of these two masses is why all objects fall at the same rate on earth. EINSTEIN in his GRT it is fundamental right http://www.einstein-online.info/spot...ence_principle MAROSZ I SOLVED VERY IMPORTANT PROBLEM Energy ( radio wave , light wave , .... ) [Joul ] space [ cubic metres ] EM radiation ( my equation is universal and can describe any Fluid ) Joul/cubic meter = Newton *meter / cubic meter = N/m^2 (pascall ) in 1861 MR Maxwell learned me that for gravitation important is body SIZE, SHAPE We must add Czerenkow's radiation to tell one more more MOTION !!! MAROSZ GRAVITATION IT IS NOT ACCELERATION AND WE CAN NOT COMPARE THIS TWO PROBLEMS !!! HISTORY 1600 Gallileo relativity hypothesis and ( ( Naturall Fall Law ) 1686 Newton ( Gravitation Law ) 1861 Maxwell ( EM radiation problem ) 2012 - Marosz - below words wrote Gallileo near 400 years ago (I marked important part (red)) " Galileo postulated his relativity hypothesis: any two observers moving at constant speed and direction with respect to one another will obtain the same results for all mechanical experiments(it is understood that the apparatuses they use for these experiments move with them). This idea has a very important consequence: velocity is not absolute. This means that velocity can only be measured in reference to some object(s), and that the result of this measurment changes if we decide to measure the velocity with respect to a diferent refernce point(s). Imagine an observer traveling inside a windowless spaceship moving away from the sun at constant velocity. Galileo asserted that there are no mechanical experiments that can be made inside the rocket that will tell the occupants that the rocket is moving . The question are we moving'' has no meaning unless we specify a reference frame (are we moving with respect to that star'' is meaningful). This fact, formulated in the 1600's remains very true today and is one of the cornerstones of Einstein's theories of relativity." MAROSZ (me ) - Maxwell 1861 showed new type of mechanicall experiment ! GALLILEO WAS NOT ABLE SPEAK ABOUT EM PREASURE !!!! "one another will obtain the same results for all mechanical experiments (it is understood that the apparatuses they use for these experiments move with them) This idea has a very important consequence: velocity is not absolute." EM radiation rise 3D with C speed respect to point where signal started ( EM preasure is giving force to object proportional to object's speed respect to point where signal started ! THE BIGEST MISTAKE MADE EINSTEIN he not invented new Natural Fall Law , (he copied Gallileo and Newton ) HIS THEORY WAS BAD BUT HE USED HIS OWN CONTACTS AND HE PUSHED HIS BAD WORDS THIS what we have in physics right not it is very dirty game people not respect TRUE and simple experiment They respect DOLARS and Marketing http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-mfX1X9yDqDw/VLuo2Th_6_I/AAAAAAAACNQ/YaGD36e4PRk/s1600/mar.jpg above test = MICHELSON MORLEY MAROSZ EM PREASURE IDEA ( we have compass !!! ) ABOVE TEST I MADE ALONE IN MY PRIVATE FLAT POLAND city WALBRZYCH 2012 DURING FIRST EXPERIMENT I WAS NEAR ALL DAY IN TOUCH ( telephon) MR BUCH MURAY USA ABOVE TEST ALSO IS SOLVING EMdrive ENGINE SECRET !!! http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-spFELf_xcJ...0/pytanie1.jpg about EM drive NASA's raport http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20140006052 Last edited by MMM; Mar 1st 2015 at 09:44 PM.
 Mar 2nd 2015, 03:07 AM #2 Banned   Join Date: Feb 2015 Posts: 162 BELOW EXPERIMENT MUST BE REPEAT AGAIN http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavendish_experiment Marosz Proposition Ultra Long Arm and great Mechanical Gear very thin rope VS very long arm !!! http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-mMdBAsBg_h...o/s1600/22.JPG Near place where we will make experiment we must build below detector ( Earth is making rotation respect to FAR FAR point in space ) Dark Box is full of Air or it can be Empty ( vacuum ) SENSOR = fillm ( more brighter film = more big EM preasure ) ENERGY IS NOT MAKING ROTATION WITH BULB NOT EXIST C+ Vearth or C- Vearth ENERGY JOUST STARTED IN SOME POINT AND RISE WITH C speed http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-pf0vOT4PC_...IQ/s1600/3.jpg I hope that above test will open people new way to convert EM radiation from UNIVERSE to electric energy similar to Wind Turbine - EM radiation turbine Czerenkow's radiation it is body's shape reaction for EM radiation in universe http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-98xCf2rAlQ...rosz%2Bfly.jpg Left side below picture it is BERNOLI ( Ball underwater . Ball is making rotation and linear motion ) http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-M9Vz3lhXLw...600/Ziemia.jpg EM radiation is able explain many Impossible for Classical Mechanica Machines ( engines ) mV = mV http://2.bp.blogspot.com/--_NXrHjIgP...I/s1600/x1.jpg NEW MORE WIDE GRAVITATION DEFINITION in universe exist N objects each object N is sending wave N Below Picture after my die will use Modern Computer ( I looking in dark sky during night -- IT IS GREAT CPU MAGISTRALE zero hot lost and ideal N informations paralel magistrale !!! ) IT IS HARD TO IMAGINE ENERGY's DENSITY LIMIT , and HOW DENSITY CHANGING signal's lost - http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-gBZZDFieaM...0/CIMG3376.JPG short time ago Earth was in point p1 ..p2...p3...Earth >>> motion http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-iNHYy6u9bR...4/s1600/em.jpg BEFORE US MANY NEW INFORMATIONS AND DISCOVERIES NEW SYSTEM FOR AIRPLANES/ROCKET http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-PqEJjEZQis...wwwwwwwwww.JPG NEW ENGINES NEW GPS SYSTEM thank You very much for suport my WORK http://maroszphysics.blogspot.com I HOPE ASAP START MANY NEW TESTS and EXPERIMENTS in international TEAM ( right now I'm 35 Years Old ) BR MACIEJ MARIAN MAROSZ POLAND ( city Walbryzch ) My country has got huge tradition and culture ( COPERNICUS stoped the SUN - MAROSZ stoped Space and Time ) http://tesla4.blogspot.com

 Tags 1kg, heavy, steel, wood

,

,

### steel wood 1kg

Click on a term to search for related topics.
 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Similar Physics Forum Discussions Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post pranimaboity2050 Advanced Mechanics 3 Oct 21st 2014 12:03 PM pranimaboity2050 Nuclear and Particle Physics 0 Oct 20th 2014 11:27 PM jijilulu Kinematics and Dynamics 8 Feb 11th 2014 10:19 AM exibo177 Equilibrium and Elasticity 2 May 29th 2012 11:32 AM werehk General Physics 1 Jul 1st 2008 03:21 AM