Go Back   Physics Help Forum > High School and Pre-University Physics Help > Kinematics and Dynamics

Kinematics and Dynamics Kinematics and Dynamics Physics Help Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Mar 1st 2015, 10:36 PM   #1
MMM
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 162
How heavy is 1kg steel and 1kg wood

**************EM radiation Is Pushing objects ***************

James Clerk Maxwell, in 1861–64, published his theory of electromagnetic fields and radiation, which shows that light has momentum and thus can exert pressure on objects. Maxwell's equations provide the theoretical foundation for sailing with light pressure. So by 1864, the physics community and beyond knew sunlight carried momentum that would exert a pressure on objects.

Radiation pressure in classical electromagnetism:
... it was published by James Clerk Maxwell in 1862,
and proven experimentally 1900-1


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_sail

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiati...gnetism:_waves

*********************************************


1kg steel compare to 1 kg wood

we speak about small and big m


******************************************


FAR FAR AWAY IN SPACE PErSON IS PUSHING
big and small m

his finger feel the same resistance !!!

conclusion ( person is in space ZERO outside gravitation signals )






http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae305.cfm

1) Inertial mass. This is mainly defined by Newton's law, the all-too-famous F = ma, which states that when a force F is applied to an object, it will accelerate proportionally, and that constant of proportion is the mass of that object. In very concrete terms, to determine the inertial mass, you apply a force of F Newtons to an object, measure the acceleration in m/s2, and F/a will give you the inertial mass m in kilograms.

2) Gravitational mass. This is defined by the force of gravitation, which states that there is a gravitational force between any pair of objects, which is given by

F = G m1 m2/r2

where G is the universal gravitational constant, m1 and m2 are the masses of the two objects, and r is the distance between them. This, in effect defines the gravitational mass of an object.

As it turns out, these two masses are equal to each other as far as we can measure. Also, the equivalence of these two masses is why all objects fall at the same rate on earth.


EINSTEIN in his GRT it is fundamental right

http://www.einstein-online.info/spot...ence_principle



MAROSZ
I SOLVED VERY IMPORTANT PROBLEM

Energy ( radio wave , light wave , .... ) [Joul ]
space [ cubic metres ]

EM radiation ( my equation is universal and can describe any Fluid )


Joul/cubic meter = Newton *meter / cubic meter = N/m^2 (pascall )


in 1861 MR Maxwell learned me that for gravitation important is body SIZE, SHAPE We must add Czerenkow's radiation to tell one more more MOTION !!!

MAROSZ GRAVITATION IT IS NOT ACCELERATION AND WE CAN NOT COMPARE THIS TWO PROBLEMS !!!


HISTORY
1600 Gallileo relativity hypothesis and ( ( Naturall Fall Law )
1686 Newton ( Gravitation Law )

1861 Maxwell ( EM radiation problem )

2012 - Marosz -

below words wrote Gallileo near 400 years ago (I marked important part (red))
" Galileo postulated his relativity hypothesis: any two observers moving at constant speed and direction with respect to one another will obtain the same results for all mechanical experiments(it is understood that the apparatuses they use for these experiments move with them).

This idea has a very important consequence: velocity is not absolute. This means that velocity can only be measured in reference to some object(s), and that the result of this measurment changes if we decide to measure the velocity with respect to a diferent refernce point(s). Imagine an observer traveling inside a windowless spaceship moving away from the sun at constant velocity. Galileo asserted that there are no mechanical experiments that can be made inside the rocket that will tell the occupants that the rocket is moving .

The question ``are we moving'' has no meaning unless we specify a reference frame (are we moving with respect to that star'' is meaningful). This fact, formulated in the 1600's remains very true today and is one of the cornerstones of Einstein's theories of relativity."



MAROSZ (me ) - Maxwell 1861 showed new type of mechanicall experiment ! GALLILEO WAS NOT ABLE SPEAK ABOUT EM PREASURE !!!!


"one another will obtain the same results for all mechanical experiments (it is understood that the apparatuses they use for these experiments move with them) This idea has a very important consequence: velocity is not absolute."



EM radiation rise 3D with C speed respect to point where signal started ( EM preasure is giving force to object proportional to object's speed respect to point where signal started !

THE BIGEST MISTAKE MADE EINSTEIN
he not invented new Natural Fall Law , (he copied Gallileo and Newton )
HIS THEORY WAS BAD BUT HE USED HIS OWN CONTACTS
AND HE PUSHED HIS BAD WORDS


THIS what we have in physics right not it is very dirty game people not respect TRUE and simple experiment
They respect DOLARS and Marketing

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-mfX1X9yDqDw/VLuo2Th_6_I/AAAAAAAACNQ/YaGD36e4PRk/s1600/mar.jpg


above test = MICHELSON MORLEY MAROSZ
EM PREASURE IDEA ( we have compass !!! )
ABOVE TEST I MADE ALONE IN MY PRIVATE FLAT
POLAND city WALBRZYCH
2012 DURING FIRST EXPERIMENT I WAS NEAR ALL DAY
IN TOUCH ( telephon) MR BUCH MURAY USA

ABOVE TEST ALSO IS SOLVING EMdrive ENGINE SECRET !!!

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-spFELf_xcJ...0/pytanie1.jpg

about EM drive



NASA's raport http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20140006052

Last edited by MMM; Mar 1st 2015 at 10:44 PM.
MMM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2nd 2015, 04:07 AM   #2
MMM
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 162
BELOW EXPERIMENT MUST BE REPEAT AGAIN

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavendish_experiment



Marosz Proposition Ultra Long Arm and great Mechanical Gear

very thin rope VS very long arm !!!

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-mMdBAsBg_h...o/s1600/22.JPG





Near place where we will make experiment we must build
below detector ( Earth is making rotation respect to FAR FAR point in space )


Dark Box is full of Air or it can be Empty ( vacuum )

SENSOR = fillm ( more brighter film = more big EM preasure )


ENERGY IS NOT MAKING ROTATION WITH BULB
NOT EXIST C+ Vearth or C- Vearth

ENERGY JOUST STARTED IN SOME POINT AND RISE WITH C speed

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-pf0vOT4PC_...IQ/s1600/3.jpg


I hope that above test will open people new way to convert EM radiation
from UNIVERSE to electric energy similar to Wind Turbine - EM radiation turbine

Czerenkow's radiation it is body's shape reaction for EM radiation in universe

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-98xCf2rAlQ...rosz%2Bfly.jpg


Left side below picture it is BERNOLI ( Ball underwater . Ball is making rotation and linear motion )

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-M9Vz3lhXLw...600/Ziemia.jpg





EM radiation is able explain many Impossible for Classical Mechanica Machines ( engines )

mV = mV

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/--_NXrHjIgP...I/s1600/x1.jpg


NEW MORE WIDE GRAVITATION DEFINITION
in universe exist N objects
each object N is sending wave N


Below Picture after my die will use Modern Computer

( I looking in dark sky during night -- IT IS GREAT CPU MAGISTRALE
zero hot lost and ideal N informations paralel magistrale !!! ) IT IS HARD TO IMAGINE ENERGY's DENSITY LIMIT , and HOW DENSITY CHANGING
signal's lost -

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-gBZZDFieaM...0/CIMG3376.JPG



short time ago Earth was in point p1 ..p2...p3...Earth >>> motion

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-iNHYy6u9bR...4/s1600/em.jpg




BEFORE US MANY NEW INFORMATIONS AND DISCOVERIES


NEW SYSTEM FOR AIRPLANES/ROCKET

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-PqEJjEZQis...wwwwwwwwww.JPG


NEW ENGINES


NEW GPS SYSTEM



thank You very much for suport my WORK

http://maroszphysics.blogspot.com


I HOPE ASAP START MANY NEW TESTS and EXPERIMENTS in international TEAM ( right now I'm 35 Years Old )

BR MACIEJ MARIAN MAROSZ
POLAND ( city Walbryzch )
My country has got huge tradition and culture ( COPERNICUS stoped the SUN - MAROSZ stoped Space and Time )

http://tesla4.blogspot.com
MMM is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  Physics Help Forum > High School and Pre-University Physics Help > Kinematics and Dynamics

Tags
1kg, heavy, steel, wood



Search tags for this page
Click on a term to search for related topics.
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Physics Forum Discussions
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Degree of freedom of a block of wood sliding on a horizontal plane pranimaboity2050 Advanced Mechanics 3 Oct 21st 2014 01:03 PM
Calculating energy released due to fission of heavy nucleus into equal nuclei pranimaboity2050 Nuclear and Particle Physics 0 Oct 21st 2014 12:27 AM
Steel balls vibration jijilulu Kinematics and Dynamics 8 Feb 11th 2014 11:19 AM
Maximum strain of steel? exibo177 Equilibrium and Elasticity 2 May 29th 2012 12:32 PM
Steel wire werehk General Physics 1 Jul 1st 2008 04:21 AM


Facebook Twitter Google+ RSS Feed