Physics Help Forum Common Misconceptions in Physics III

 General Physics General Physics Help Forum

 Sep 24th 2019, 06:30 PM #1 Forum Admin     Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: On the dance floor, baby! Posts: 2,856 Common Misconceptions in Physics III Let's get a fresh start here. This is a place to discuss various subtleties in Physics that may be common or generally accepted but turn out to be wrong. -Dan __________________ Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup. See the forum rules here.
 Sep 24th 2019, 07:31 PM #2 Senior Member   Join Date: Mar 2019 Location: cosmos Posts: 666 wave function vs particle state "...Most of Introductory level QM deals with Linear Algebra at its base concepts. Along with that concept comes "linear superposition," which means that we can simply add the wavefunctions as they move with respect to each other. No, waves cannot be considered to be a sum of particle states." ....................... This semi-tramp desn't know if his old QM texbook outdated. It tells: ...use wave function to describe particle state. If the "linear superposition" of wave functions does not mean "a sum of particle states", what is it? If someone misconsider it's "a sum of paricles moving with different momentum values", that's misconcept.
 Sep 25th 2019, 01:52 AM #3 Senior Member   Join Date: Mar 2019 Location: cosmos Posts: 666 Cpt What's the symbol of "-t" mean in physics? Can anyone in this cosmos go back in time to ask Einstein? Don't talk that kind of thing to this semi-tramp, he is scared... Attached Thumbnails
 Sep 25th 2019, 06:08 AM #4 Senior Member     Join Date: Jun 2016 Location: England Posts: 1,060 Back in time for t Time is a very difficult quantity to define precisely. I get the impression that the seemingly simple "t" in certain equations is actually somewhat different from the apparently identical "t" used in other equations. This seems particularly apparent in the 4D Space-Time equations vs the Quantum Mechanics equations. And these are again different from the "t" in Entropy... I suppose that all these "t"s must be connected somehow, but I am not aware of any articles exploring this avenue. Until we have a clear idea of what +t is, we have little hope of defining -t. __________________ ~\o/~
 Sep 25th 2019, 06:42 AM #5 Senior Member   Join Date: Mar 2019 Location: cosmos Posts: 666 -t vs another cosmos "...Until we have a clear idea of what +t is, we have little hope of defining -t. " Yes, Woody. I don't talk more here. Thank you.

 Tags common, iii, misconceptions, physics

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Similar Physics Forum Discussions Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post topsquark General Physics 31 Sep 25th 2019 03:55 PM Pmb Philosophy of Physics 18 Mar 14th 2018 05:51 AM arbolis General Physics 38 Feb 28th 2018 11:18 AM sorin Philosophy of Physics 7 Jul 2nd 2015 12:43 AM topsquark Physics Resources 0 Apr 24th 2008 10:53 AM