Go Back   Physics Help Forum > College/University Physics Help > General Physics

General Physics General Physics Help Forum

Like Tree3Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 21st 2019, 08:54 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 506
US Navy release patents for anti grav technology

This is something many observers have been expecting for a long time. The release of high tech to the surface population , tech which had previously been hoarded and kept off world... Trumps 'Space Force' is part of the same process ...

"18 Apr 2019 ...The US Navy has been granted a patent for an advanced aircraft which resembles a flying saucer UFO. Military inventors filed plans for a highly unusual flying machine which uses an ‘inertial mass reduction device’ to travel at ‘extreme speeds’. What that means is that the aircraft uses complex technology to reduce its mass and thereby lessen inertia (an object’s resistance to motion) so it can zoom along at high velocities. The patent is highly complex and describes methods of reducing the mass of an aircraft . These drawings were filed as part of the patent and show a craft which looks a lot like a UFO (Photo: Salvatore Cezar Pais/ Google) ‘It is possible to reduce the inertial mass and hence the gravitational mass, of a system/object in motion, by an abrupt perturbation of the non-linear background of local spacetime,’ the patent says. The craft described in the patent features a cavity wall filled with gas, which is then made to vibrate using powerful electromagnetic waves. This then creates a vacuum around the craft, allowing it to propel itself at high speeds. The UFO-style ship can be used in water, air or even space. ‘It is possible to envision a hybrid aerospace/undersea craft (HAUC), which due to the physical mechanisms enabled with the inertial mass reduction device, can function as a submersible craft capable of extreme underwater speeds… and enhanced stealth capabilities,’ the patent continues. ‘This hybrid craft would move with great ease through the air/space/water mediums, by being enclosed in a vacuum plasma bubble/sheath.’ Although the US Navy applied for the patent in 2016 and it was granted last year, it doesn’t necessarily mean the craft has been built and tested. However, the technology is further evidence of the military’s interest in developing ‘exotic’ technologies. U.S. DoD video of F/A-18 Super Hornet and an unknown object. Play Video Loaded: 0% 0:00Progress: 0% PlayMute Current Time 0:00 / Duration Time 0:33 Fullscreen MORE: Pentagon and MoD officials feared UFOs were either ‘demonic’ or sent by God, former investigators reveal Earlier this year, it was revealed that US government researchers investigated wormholes, antigravity, invisibility cloaking, warp drives and high energy laser weapons during a probe into ‘unexplained aerial phenomena’ called the Advanced Aerospace Threat and Identification Program (AATIP). Details of AATIP were first released in 2017, including reports of a sighting made by fighter pilots from the USS Nimitz. These pilots saw a huge patch of churning, turbulent water the size of a Boeing 737, suggesting something was beneath the surface, as well as a ‘tic tac’ aircraft which zoomed off at almost impossibly high speeds. We spoke to Nick Pope, former UFO investigator at the Ministry of Defence, and asked if he saw any similarities between the patented design and the Nimitz Tic Tac. ‘A hybrid craft, capable of flying both in the air and underwater, is uncannily similar to what was reported in the USS Nimitz incident from 2004,’ he said. ‘There was a similar incident of a UFO flying underwater in Puerto Rico in 2013. The possible connection between the USS Nimitz incident and this patent is intriguing, and it’s interesting that the US Navy seems to be the link here. ‘It’s possible that the patent is inspired by the incident and is part of an attempt to work out the technology behind the objects that were chased by the Navy F-18s. This is known as ‘reverse-engineering’.’...."

oz93666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 22nd 2019, 03:17 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: cosmos
Posts: 553
Talking

Oz:
It seems to beyond technology and engineering.
Somewhat alike science fiction, that kind of Holleywood...
(But I can't exclude the existance of a symmetric cosmos. If matters in that cosmos interact with us, any physical rule will reverse. But nobody knows where's it. It will be the ultimate topic even beyond anti matter, dark matter, etc. Not a device made up matter in this cosmos is able to do that, I guess. A s - dragon will be there, perhaps...)

Last edited by neila9876; May 22nd 2019 at 03:36 AM.
neila9876 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 22nd 2019, 05:49 AM   #3
Physics Team
 
ChipB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Morristown, NJ USA
Posts: 2,352
I sincerely doubt that the patent says anything about "anti gravity," but to be sure, please provide the patent number so we can review it.
topsquark and neila9876 like this.
ChipB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 22nd 2019, 09:58 AM   #4
Forum Admin
 
topsquark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: On the dance floor, baby!
Posts: 2,807
I have heard that a saucer shaped aircraft is actually very unstable in flight. However that didn't stop the Navy from building one. A few years ago the Navy flew it to a military airshow, with predictable results.

-Dan
__________________
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

See the forum rules here.
topsquark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 22nd 2019, 08:20 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 506
Originally Posted by ChipB View Post
I sincerely doubt that the patent says anything about "anti gravity," but to be sure, please provide the patent number so we can review it.


Some disagreement on the wed about this , some believe the whole thing maybe diss-info ...or that the Navy have now covered their tracks.


Last edited by oz93666; May 22nd 2019 at 08:22 PM.
oz93666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23rd 2019, 06:08 AM   #6
Physics Team
 
ChipB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Morristown, NJ USA
Posts: 2,352
I reviewed the patent (US 10144532B2), and it describes a craft that would use high energy microwaves to reduce the inertial mass of its structure, apparently by altering the normal occurrence of "quantum fluctuations" in the region adjacent to the craft, presumably creating a quantum vacuum that can pull the craft forward, while also reducing the craft's inertial mass. Not sure this quantum disruption conjecture has ever been demonstrated even on a small scale in a lab, so whether it could be applied to a large craft seems highly speculative. My guess is that if the phenomenon could be demonstrated it would require an enormous amount of energy.

In my experience patent applications like this are typically rejected as purely speculative unless the inventor can demonstrate the feasibility of the technology, and in this patent there is no discussion of models or lab experiments, just references to other papers by the inventor (including one that claims this type of technology can lead to faster-than-light travel). So I'm a bit surprised that the patent was granted. One other note - given that the Naval Air Warfare Center decided to pursue a patent, meaning the information is made freely available to all including potential military adversaries, I think this signals that they see no real practical application of the technology.
topsquark likes this.
ChipB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23rd 2019, 07:45 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: cosmos
Posts: 553
Talking physics vs film

ChipB seems to be an honest analyst.
Modern physics seems to be a headless fly.
Where's benit13? He seems to be the film director...
Cosmos Navy...
Holleywood...
neila9876 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23rd 2019, 01:00 PM   #8
Forum Admin
 
topsquark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: On the dance floor, baby!
Posts: 2,807
Originally Posted by topsquark View Post
I have heard that a saucer shaped aircraft is actually very unstable in flight. However that didn't stop the Navy from building one. A few years ago the Navy flew it to a military airshow, with predictable results.

-Dan
Just in case anyone starts thinking about this, the saucer the Navy built used the usual jet thing, not antigravity or some other unknown propulsion.

-Dan
__________________
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

See the forum rules here.
topsquark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23rd 2019, 04:36 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: cosmos
Posts: 553
Smile

@dragon:
I read some materials about "quantum fluctuation" in web before, but I feel them messy and cryptic.
Can you make a decent introduction here?
Thanks.
neila9876 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23rd 2019, 05:49 PM   #10
Forum Admin
 
topsquark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: On the dance floor, baby!
Posts: 2,807
Originally Posted by neila9876 View Post
@dragon:
I read some materials about "quantum fluctuation" in web before, but I feel them messy and cryptic.
Can you make a decent introduction here?
Thanks.
Ummmmm..... To do this properly would require the introductory chapter of a book on Quantum Statistical Mechanics and this is not a part of QM that I know all that well. I'm going to have to say "no" to this one. Sorry!

-Dan
__________________
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

See the forum rules here.
topsquark is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  Physics Help Forum > College/University Physics Help > General Physics

Tags
anti, grav, navy, patents, release, technology



Search tags for this page
Click on a term to search for related topics.
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Physics Forum Discussions
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How close in todays technology of building a human memory erasing machine. Could it b noabsortion1 Atomic and Solid State Physics 0 Apr 20th 2016 11:55 AM
Why does Mobile phone select Bluetooth technology? oem7110 Energy and Work 7 Mar 13th 2014 10:02 AM
Trying Anti-gravity nullflux8 Theoretical Physics 14 Sep 24th 2013 07:30 AM
force supplied by vertebrae, minimal strain, center of grav nmyers77 Equilibrium and Elasticity 1 Oct 17th 2010 02:29 AM
anti-particles Bruce Burrows Theoretical Physics 1 Feb 22nd 2010 12:37 AM


Facebook Twitter Google+ RSS Feed