Go Back   Physics Help Forum > High School and Pre-University Physics Help > Energy and Work

Energy and Work Energy and Work Physics Help Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Mar 21st 2019, 03:25 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 2
Where is the mistake in this reasoning?

Situation #1.
In space, an object is moving with a constant velocity in an inertial reference frame. The object is connected to a winch (winch “A”) with a rope. Winch “A” is resting in the inertial reference frame. The rope’s end that is on the object’s side is not simply tied to it. It is connected to another winch (winch “B”) on the object. Winch “B” winds the rope in a way that it keeps the rope streached, but it doesn’t draw it (ie. the winch’s action doesn’t affect the object’s velocity).
Then, winch “A” starts winding the rope’s other end. After working for some time it stops. As it worked, it consumed some amount of energy. That energy is transfered to the object.

Situation #2.

Evereything is as in the situation #1 except these two:

1. The object is moving faster;
2. Winch “B” winds the rope correspondingly faster to keep it streached.

In both the situation the energies that are used to power winches “A” are same and they are transferred to the objects (ie. the objects gained same energies).

But in the situation #2 the object travells longer distance in the period the winch “A” works (because it was moving faster) . Hence the work done by the force that draws the object to winch “A” is greater. That means, in situation 2, the object gains more energy than in situation 1.
Cobain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 21st 2019, 04:38 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 369
Originally Posted by Cobain View Post
Situation #1.
The rope’s end that is on the object’s side is not simply tied to it. It is connected to another winch (winch “B”) on the object. Winch “B” winds the rope in a way that it keeps the rope streached, but it doesn’t draw it (ie. the winch’s action doesn’t affect the object’s velocity).
?

Can you please draw a diagram?
benit13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 21st 2019, 04:52 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Woody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: England
Posts: 883
I can't work out the purpose of winch 2.

By setting the scenario "in space" I am guessing that you are implying it is in "free-fall" (without gravity).
__________________
~\o/~
Woody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 21st 2019, 05:18 AM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 2
The purpose of the winch B is to ensure when winch A starts to pull the rope, it pull equally streached ropes in both scenarios.

The object is in zero-gravity space.
Cobain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 21st 2019, 05:53 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 484
The puzzle has not been fully defined ...

the mass of winch A has not been given .(it must have a mass otherwise it cannot 'pull')

the combined mass of the object and winch B has not been given .

basically you have two masses connected by a rope , the system does not know or care which winch creates the pull.

As soon as either winch makes the slightest pull the two masses have a relative velocity which draws them together.
oz93666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 21st 2019, 11:00 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Woody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: England
Posts: 883
I have been trying to understand your word picture.

Winch A starts pulling the object,
The object accelerates until it is moving at the same rate as the rate at which the winch is pulling.
Note the above scenario already assumes that:
Either the winch is pulling at a varying rate from zero up to some maximum
Or the rope is stretching to allow the object to accelerate (or a bit of both)
The object can't go from zero to full speed without accelerating.

The rope will remain taut throughout the above process.

Now Winch A stops, but the object keeps moving (assuming negligible friction)
The rope will go slack.
Is this where Winch B starts taking up the slack?

Note (Oz) that I have assumed that Winch A is attached to a structure
which is sufficiently more massive than the object and rope etc.
that its motion (relative to the motion of the object) can be assumed negligible.
(but not so massive that its gravitational attraction becomes significant).
__________________
~\o/~
Woody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 21st 2019, 11:09 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Woody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: England
Posts: 883
I've looked again at your original post;

You do say that the object is initially moving,
the winches, it seems, are just taking up the slack.

In this scenario the winches are actually doing nothing at all!

All the winches will be doing is replacing any losses (friction) in the system.
__________________
~\o/~
Woody is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  Physics Help Forum > High School and Pre-University Physics Help > Energy and Work

Tags
energy changes, mistake, reasoning



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Physics Forum Discussions
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Watch the biggest mistake we make in defining acceleration StudyMadeEasy Kinematics and Dynamics 0 Feb 17th 2017 12:23 PM
TYPICAL MISTAKE IN BOOKS ( physics ) MMM Advanced Optics 2 May 6th 2015 03:13 AM
I can't find my mistake in this zero momentum problem... Bmurw Kinematics and Dynamics 5 Nov 7th 2014 06:48 AM
explaining the reasoning, no calcs. rcmango Electricity and Magnetism 3 Jul 13th 2011 03:22 PM


Facebook Twitter Google+ RSS Feed