Go Back   Physics Help Forum > High School and Pre-University Physics Help > Electricity and Magnetism

Electricity and Magnetism Electricity and Magnetism Physics Help Forum

Like Tree2Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Sep 21st 2016, 04:40 AM   #11
Physics Team
 
ChipB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Morristown, NJ USA
Posts: 2,352
Originally Posted by ohm View Post
I think there may be charges inside the box. Equal no of +ve and -ve charges may be inside the box. In effect net charge will be zero.
If so then there would be no flux through the surface.

Originally Posted by ohm View Post
My question is Why INSIDE the box why not Surface of the box.
I think you're trying to read too much into the question. The point is this: if there is a flux through any closed boundary, there must be a charge within that boundary.
topsquark likes this.
ChipB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 22nd 2016, 10:10 AM   #12
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 24
Ohm, do you feel like you're getting the hang of Gauss's Law problems? You've got some kind of material (maybe conductor, maybe insulator, sometimes both) which may or may not have a net charge. Then you construct some kind of shell around it, usually a box or spherical shell or cylindrical shell in these problems. This shell is typically imaginary! It's just there to enclose the material which may or may not be charged. You shouldn't think of the shell as something that might conduct the charge. It's just a surface to help you solve the problem. In your problem, don't think of the box as touching the charged material inside. It's just there to surround it so that you can ask hypothetical questions and employ Gauss's Law.

Also, there may be some positive and negative charges in the real material that sits within the imaginary shell, but we're only worried about the net charge. In your problem, you mention an equal number of +ve and -ve charges. That tells you immediately that the net charge adds up to zero.

You're absolutely right regarding charge being forced to the surface of a conductor. When envisioning a solid metal sphere (which is the real material and not the imaginary enclosing surface) with a net negative charge for instance (extra electrons), you can "feel" the electrons repelling each other and pushing each other to the surface of the sphere. They'll stop there because they can go no farther, although the "push" is still present as they sit on the surface. Now let's try some imaginary spherical shells. One that resides completely within the surface of the metal sphere will have no net charge inside (we know it's all on the surface of the real sphere and outside of our imaginary shell). So no charge within = no flux. Now put another imaginary shell totally outside the real metal sphere. The net negative charge is all inside it. So there will be flux per the equation given.

Quite the long-winded answer. Make sense though?
ChipB likes this.
CorneliusXI is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  Physics Help Forum > High School and Pre-University Physics Help > Electricity and Magnetism

Tags
charge, conductor, inside



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Physics Forum Discussions
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Magnetic field in a Circular conductor vs Flat Conductor big Electricity and Magnetism 0 Jan 14th 2015 07:54 AM
The relation of colour charge to electric charge PAMD1958 Nuclear and Particle Physics 0 Aug 13th 2013 09:42 AM
Infinite Conductor within Infinite Conductor - Current Density between BloodBaneZXY Electricity and Magnetism 2 May 3rd 2010 01:12 AM
Uniform line charge of linear charge density + E field chevy900ss Electricity and Magnetism 12 Mar 17th 2010 07:09 PM
Total charge of sphere with varying charge density? dspaulding09 Electricity and Magnetism 1 Feb 24th 2010 06:59 PM


Facebook Twitter Google+ RSS Feed