Go Back   Physics Help Forum > College/University Physics Help > Advanced Mechanics

Advanced Mechanics Advanced Mechanics Physics Help Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Mar 8th 2016, 02:14 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 10
Exclamation Simply supported beam

Hello, I'm a bit confused on my coursework when calculating the bending moment, friends are saying different things and I don't know anymore.

We have a thin walled cylinder that is simply supported over 8m and it has a mass of 15000kg. The inner diameter is 1750mm and it has a wall thickness of 10mm. The cylinder operates at a pressure of 0.075 Mn/m^2 and during operation it is subjected to an axial force of 150kN and a torque of 800 kNm.
(i) Calculate the component stresses
(ii) Evaluate the 2D complex stress system

It was not stated if it was a udl or point load so we kinda just assumed it was a udl therefore;

F = m*g
F = 15000*9.8
F = 147000N

M = W x L /8
M = 147000 x 8/8
M = 147000 N/m
M = 147x10^6 N/mm

Is this correct? My friend says he has proof that it can be a point load but hasn't showed me the literature.

sigma d = -F/A = 150x10^3/55292.03
sigma d = -2.7 MN/m^2

sigma h = pd/2t = (0.075x10^6)x1.75/2*0.01
sigma h = 6.6MN/m^2

sigma l = pd/4t = (0.075x10^6)x1.75/4*0.01
sigma l = 3.3MN/m^2

tau = Tr/J = (800x10^3)x0.885/0.043
tau = 16.5MN/m^2

J was calculated as 0.043m^4
I was calculated as 2.141x10^10mm^4

Once I figure out the bending stress I'm going to determine the magnitude of the principal stressses analytically and graphically.

Last edited by Molyticus; Mar 9th 2016 at 01:15 AM. Reason: Extra info
Molyticus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8th 2016, 03:08 PM   #2
Physics Team
 
ChipB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Naperville, IL USA
Posts: 2,271
The weight of the beam is 147,000 N, and is simply supported at each end that means that the support reaction force at each end is half of that, or 73,500 N each. You can assume that the load of the weight is uniformly distributed along the length of the cylinder. Hence the shear as a function of position x is:

V(x) = F_r - 147,000 (x/L)

and the moment is the integral of that:

M(x) = F_r x - 147,000 x^2/(2L)
ChipB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8th 2016, 03:24 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 10
Originally Posted by ChipB View Post
The weight of the beam is 147,000 N, and is simply supported at each end that means that the support reaction force at each end is half of that, or 73,500 N each. You can assume that the load of the weight is uniformly distributed along the length of the cylinder. Hence the shear as a function of position x is:

V(x) = F_r - 147,000 (x/L)

and the moment is the integral of that:

M(x) = F_r x - 147,000 x^2/(2L)
Would it be wrong to assume it was a point load or is this ok as the weight acts on the centre of gravity? I uploaded a picture as well if that helps.
Molyticus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8th 2016, 04:28 PM   #4
Physics Team
 
ChipB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Naperville, IL USA
Posts: 2,271
Mass (and hence weight) is distributed, not a point load. And yes, it makes a difference.

But now that you've uploaded the picture I see an additional compressive force of 150 KN, which I assume is in addition to the cylinder's mass of 15 Kg. You hadn't mentioned this, and it introduces a different thing to consider. So - does this new force act on the cylinder in addition to the cylinder's weight?
ChipB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8th 2016, 04:41 PM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 10
Originally Posted by ChipB View Post
Mass (and hence weight) is distributed, not a point load. And yes, it makes a difference.

But now that you've uploaded the picture I see an additional compressive force of 150 KN, which I assume is in addition to the cylinder's mass of 15 Kg. You hadn't mentioned this, and it introduces a different thing to consider. So - does this new force act on the cylinder in addition to the cylinder's weight?
Yes it does but I think I'm ok with that. So my compressive stress ie sigma d would be;

sigma d = -F/A = 150x10^3/55292.03
sigma d = -2.7 Mn/m^2

I've done most of the calculations in relation to stress I just couldn't calculate the bending stress as I was unsure about the bending moment. We were also given the torque and internal pressure but I didn't feel that those values were necessary as I only needed help with the bending moment. I've calculated the hoop stress and longitudinal stress as well though.
Molyticus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8th 2016, 05:13 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Somerset, England
Posts: 688
I agree with chip, you need to consider (and provide here) all the information.

1) That picture shows the supports almost at the quarter points so the basic elastic curve will have three sections.

2) The horizontal force shown is effectively prestressing, which will affect the bending stress.

3) The pressure induced stresses will subject the the tube wall material to a triaxial stress system.
studiot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 9th 2016, 02:23 AM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 10
Originally Posted by studiot View Post
I agree with chip, you need to consider (and provide here) all the information.
I've added all the information given in the question and what I've found so far.
Molyticus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  Physics Help Forum > College/University Physics Help > Advanced Mechanics

Tags
beam, simply, supported



Search tags for this page
Click on a term to search for related topics.
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Physics Forum Discussions
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
beam combiner suma Light and Optics 0 May 3rd 2014 09:05 PM
Upper limit to size of Air Supported Structure Tesla Advanced Waves and Sound 2 Jun 7th 2013 11:22 PM
Simply Rocket huge question why ? tesla2 Special and General Relativity 25 Feb 18th 2013 08:40 PM
Reactions of the beam cutiemike1 Advanced Mechanics 2 Feb 10th 2011 06:42 PM
simply supported at both ends round beam JAW Advanced Mechanics 2 Dec 11th 2009 12:00 PM


Facebook Twitter Google+ RSS Feed